From: Tom B. <tom...@gm...> - 2011-09-14 18:16:28
|
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:52, brlcad <br...@ma...> wrote: > On Sep 14, 2011, at 12:46 PM, Tom Browder <tom...@gm...> wrote: ... > Another thing that confused me until a bit ago was the presence of > some old directories that are no longer in the trunk tree. I thought > svn update would take care of that, but I've had no warnings about > existing dirs now deleted. > > > If you run svn update and a directory is deleted, svn will remove all of the > svn files and the directory but not if you've added any files. Since it > won't delete your files, it can't remove the directory. The directory turd > is left around for you to decide what to do with those files. > After running autogen.sh and configure in the source tree, there will > potentially be Makefile.in and other files scattered throughout the > hierarchy that svn knows nothing about. They're the usual culprit. That was probably it. > 'svn status' for the win. ;) Yep, when a working directory has been around a long time with so much activity in the repo one needs to do that at least once a year! Best regards, and thanks. -Tom |