Menu

#84 Touching LD_LIBRARY_PATH and PATH may be unnecessary

closed-out-of-date
5
2010-11-05
2010-10-27
quadrispro
No

Hi!

On Debian we don't need to append /{,usr/{,local/}}lib to LD_LIBRARY_PATH and /usr/{,local/}bin to the PATH, these changes are unnecessary. I've applied the following patch:

---
bin/startBristol.in | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

--- bristol.orig/bin/startBristol.in
+++ bristol/bin/startBristol.in
@@ -410,9 +410,6 @@ fi
export SLAB_HOME=$BRISTOL
export BRIGHTON=$BRISTOL

-export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=@BRISTOL_DIR@/lib:/usr/local/lib:/usr/lib:/lib
-
-export PATH=${PATH}:$BRISTOL/bin:/usr/local/bin

if [ $jack -eq 1 ]; then
ldd `which bristol` | grep jack > /dev/null 2>&1

Discussion

  • Nick Copeland

    Nick Copeland - 2010-10-27
    • labels: --> Interface (example)
    • assigned_to: nobody --> ncopeland
     
  • Nick Copeland

    Nick Copeland - 2010-10-27

    This startBristol.in has now been changed radically. It now uses /bin/sh rather than bash, the path has changed from an 'export' naturally and these have been dropped.

     
  • Nick Copeland

    Nick Copeland - 2010-10-29

    There is nothing to change in the current release. The patch provided here can be used on the stream being distributed. Potentially a 0.50 version could be made available with this fix however unless that gets distributed there is little benefit in a retro release.

     
  • Nick Copeland

    Nick Copeland - 2010-10-29
    • status: open --> pending
     
  • Nick Copeland

    Nick Copeland - 2010-11-05

    This is resolved in the newer releases, closed.

     
  • Nick Copeland

    Nick Copeland - 2010-11-05
    • status: pending --> closed-out-of-date
     

Log in to post a comment.