From: jiho <jo....@gm...> - 2005-02-16 11:35:49
|
Le 16 f=E9vr. 05, =E0 12:22, Christiaan Hofman a =E9crit : > On Feb 16, 2005, at 11:34, jiho wrote: >> Hi list, >> >> I've just downloaded version 0.98. I've been looking forward to the=20= >> new paper renaming feature and I'm glad to see it in this release.=20 >> I've a problem though. My format is the following: >> %a1%Y%u0%e >> =3D >> First author + Year with century + Unique letter + File extension >> I expected this to give me: >> McCracken2004.pdf when this was my only record for this author in=20 >> this year; and McCracken2004a.pdf and McCracken2004b.pdf if I had two=20= >> (%u0 is marked as "Sufficient unique letter" in the autogenerated=20 >> cite key that I was using). Nevertheless, I receive an error when=20 >> second case occurs. Is this to be expected or is this a "bug"? >> > I am very afraid this is a bug. It should look at existing files, but=20= > it now doesn't look in the right place. It will be fixed in the next=20= > version, alas too late for this release. ok. thanks. >> In addition, I found the Preview file and Preview text buttons really=20= >> useful and I'm disappointed to see them disappear. Indeed, filling in=20= >> the fields of a new bibliography item was great with these: juste=20 >> drag and drop the article in bibdesk, it creates a new entry, click=20= >> on preview text and copy paste! just great. Here the preview text=20 >> item is longer to get. I'm fillling much of my bibliography by hand=20= >> necause there are few free databases in my field of interest and=20 >> therefore few tools to get this information automatically. Does=20 >> somebody agree with this opinion? >> > Note that the functionality is still there, we just moved it to the=20 > menu of the View File popup button. I guess that should have been=20 > mentioned more clearly in the release notes. Click on the little arrow=20= > or hold down the mouse on the button. We thought it is more=20 > appropriate there, and also greatly cleans up the already too clogged=20= > editor UI. I found it but I just find it less usable: more difficult to get and=20 often I click on the PDF icon rather that on the arrow (which is quite=20= small) and it opens the pdf and not the test in the drawer. but it's my personal opinion I was just asking the users for theirs ;-) JiHO --- Windows, c'est un peu comme le beaujolais nouveau : a chaque nouvelle cuvee on sait que ce sera degueulasse, mais on en prend quand meme par masochisme. --- http://jo.irisson.free.fr/ |