From: Maxwell, A. R <ada...@pn...> - 2005-08-26 00:52:40
|
On Aug 25, 2005, at 17:37, Christiaan Hofman wrote: > > On Aug 26, 2005, at 3:30 , Maxwell, Adam R wrote: > >> >> On Aug 25, 2005, at 17:10, Christiaan Hofman wrote: >> >> >>> I am not sure if it now makes sense to copy the user .cfg files. >>> I don't think they are used, at least that is what I read from >>> the man pages. latex2rtf does not look in the working path unless >>> you give it as the -P option. As this is now the main bundle >>> again, the copied user .cfg files are not used. Or are the man >>> pages wrong? >>> >> >> Users of jurabib have problems with latex/bibtex requiring some >> jurabib .cfg file that apparently resides in the working >> directory. Those files are still copied from application support. >> >> The latex2rtf program .cfg files that we have in the bundle are >> totally unrelated to jurabib, and should have no bearing on the >> problem that was reported. >> >> -- Adam > > So you are saying that it is necessary to copy user .cfg files, Yes > and that latex2rtf _does_ look in the working directory (contrary > to what the man page says)? No, I'm saying that latex2rtf does not support jurabib (and is not likely to) so its options and config files are irrelevant to this discussion. Adam |