Re: [Bastille-linux-discuss] Bastille for Red Hat Enterprise 3 - errors

[James T. <ja...@lo...>]

Jay Beale wrote:
> In the wise words of James Turnbull:

> OK, I admit it.  I installed by third-party RPM on my test machine,
> but didn't include that in the original announcement because I hadn't
> had a chance to vet the RPM and make sure it didn't have badness.
> I've added the following to the site:

Jay

Please take no offense but if this is the case I don't feel 100% confident
that you can legitimately say Bastille works on RHEL 3 when you have to use
an RPM that potentially comes from an untrusted source - especially given
the purpose of the Bastille application is security hardening.  Seems like a
risk most auditors would deem unacceptable.

Regards

James Turnbull