Re: [Bacula-users] Mac OS X

[Eamon B. <ebr...@en...>]

I could have a go at implementing it. But i dont know if its straight 
forward - this has a lot to do with
how the storage daemon handles the storage of file information, the 
file daemon would also have to
interpret the information back into data/resource forks.

I will look into the documentation and see how it can be done.

- eb.

On 29/02/2004, at 2:24 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Bacula does not save the resource fork. I don't have a Mac so am 
> waiting
> for someone to submit a patch that implements it.
>
> Regards, Kern
>
> On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 20:33, FireWire BSD wrote:
>> Hi,
>>   I have a question regarding the resource fork of HFS+ for Mac OS X
>> systems.
>> In fact i tried the latest bacula client for macOS X, it backups
>> correctly and restore correctly only for the data fork.
>> Is there something i misconfigured?
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
>> Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
>> a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
>> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bacula-users mailing list
>> Bac...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
> Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
> a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bac...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>