You can subscribe to this list here.
2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(19) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(23) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002 |
Jan
(18) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(27) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(40) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(67) |
Aug
(107) |
Sep
(75) |
Oct
(74) |
Nov
(73) |
Dec
(63) |
2003 |
Jan
(93) |
Feb
(97) |
Mar
(72) |
Apr
(129) |
May
(110) |
Jun
(97) |
Jul
(151) |
Aug
(124) |
Sep
(66) |
Oct
(216) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(151) |
2004 |
Jan
(107) |
Feb
(181) |
Mar
(235) |
Apr
(212) |
May
(231) |
Jun
(231) |
Jul
(264) |
Aug
(278) |
Sep
(173) |
Oct
(259) |
Nov
(164) |
Dec
(244) |
2005 |
Jan
(318) |
Feb
(206) |
Mar
(287) |
Apr
(222) |
May
(240) |
Jun
(255) |
Jul
(166) |
Aug
(289) |
Sep
(233) |
Oct
(200) |
Nov
(307) |
Dec
(170) |
2006 |
Jan
(289) |
Feb
(270) |
Mar
(306) |
Apr
(150) |
May
(181) |
Jun
(263) |
Jul
(181) |
Aug
(291) |
Sep
(147) |
Oct
(155) |
Nov
(381) |
Dec
(310) |
2007 |
Jan
(431) |
Feb
(306) |
Mar
(378) |
Apr
(216) |
May
(313) |
Jun
(235) |
Jul
(373) |
Aug
(171) |
Sep
(459) |
Oct
(642) |
Nov
(464) |
Dec
(419) |
2008 |
Jan
(374) |
Feb
(445) |
Mar
(400) |
Apr
(406) |
May
(374) |
Jun
(346) |
Jul
(387) |
Aug
(302) |
Sep
(255) |
Oct
(374) |
Nov
(292) |
Dec
(488) |
2009 |
Jan
(392) |
Feb
(240) |
Mar
(245) |
Apr
(483) |
May
(310) |
Jun
(494) |
Jul
(265) |
Aug
(515) |
Sep
(514) |
Oct
(284) |
Nov
(338) |
Dec
(329) |
2010 |
Jan
(305) |
Feb
(246) |
Mar
(404) |
Apr
(391) |
May
(302) |
Jun
(166) |
Jul
(166) |
Aug
(234) |
Sep
(222) |
Oct
(267) |
Nov
(219) |
Dec
(244) |
2011 |
Jan
(189) |
Feb
(220) |
Mar
(353) |
Apr
(322) |
May
(270) |
Jun
(202) |
Jul
(172) |
Aug
(215) |
Sep
(226) |
Oct
(169) |
Nov
(163) |
Dec
(152) |
2012 |
Jan
(182) |
Feb
(221) |
Mar
(117) |
Apr
(151) |
May
(169) |
Jun
(135) |
Jul
(140) |
Aug
(108) |
Sep
(148) |
Oct
(97) |
Nov
(119) |
Dec
(66) |
2013 |
Jan
(105) |
Feb
(127) |
Mar
(265) |
Apr
(84) |
May
(75) |
Jun
(116) |
Jul
(89) |
Aug
(118) |
Sep
(132) |
Oct
(247) |
Nov
(98) |
Dec
(109) |
2014 |
Jan
(81) |
Feb
(101) |
Mar
(101) |
Apr
(79) |
May
(132) |
Jun
(102) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(114) |
Sep
(104) |
Oct
(126) |
Nov
(146) |
Dec
(46) |
2015 |
Jan
(51) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(83) |
Apr
(40) |
May
(68) |
Jun
(43) |
Jul
(38) |
Aug
(33) |
Sep
(88) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(53) |
Dec
(119) |
2016 |
Jan
(268) |
Feb
(42) |
Mar
(86) |
Apr
(73) |
May
(239) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(89) |
Aug
(60) |
Sep
(49) |
Oct
(66) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(34) |
2017 |
Jan
(81) |
Feb
(103) |
Mar
(161) |
Apr
(137) |
May
(230) |
Jun
(111) |
Jul
(135) |
Aug
(92) |
Sep
(118) |
Oct
(85) |
Nov
(110) |
Dec
(84) |
2018 |
Jan
(75) |
Feb
(59) |
Mar
(48) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(63) |
Jun
(44) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(61) |
Sep
(42) |
Oct
(108) |
Nov
(76) |
Dec
(48) |
2019 |
Jan
(38) |
Feb
(47) |
Mar
(18) |
Apr
(98) |
May
(47) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(48) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(33) |
Oct
(20) |
Nov
(30) |
Dec
(38) |
2020 |
Jan
(29) |
Feb
(49) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(87) |
May
(66) |
Jun
(98) |
Jul
(25) |
Aug
(49) |
Sep
(22) |
Oct
(124) |
Nov
(66) |
Dec
(26) |
2021 |
Jan
(131) |
Feb
(109) |
Mar
(71) |
Apr
(56) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(12) |
Jul
(36) |
Aug
(38) |
Sep
(54) |
Oct
(17) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(23) |
2022 |
Jan
(56) |
Feb
(56) |
Mar
(73) |
Apr
(25) |
May
(15) |
Jun
(22) |
Jul
(20) |
Aug
(36) |
Sep
(24) |
Oct
(21) |
Nov
(78) |
Dec
(42) |
2023 |
Jan
(47) |
Feb
(45) |
Mar
(31) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(15) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(37) |
Aug
(24) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(15) |
Nov
(15) |
Dec
(20) |
2024 |
Jan
(24) |
Feb
(37) |
Mar
(14) |
Apr
(22) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Les M. <le...@fu...> - 2005-11-15 18:51:36
|
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 07:11, Chuck Witt wrote: > I realize I can start over (all my config files are backed up). I could also > put 4 more drives and some controller cards in and rebuild with a raid array > over LVM (probably most sensible). The last option is offsite storage or > external storage or removable storage. I do not belive I have seen an easy > or low cost way using removable drives to rotate a 4 drive array in and out > of the BackupPC machine. Yes, I can envision a 4 drive raid array with a 4 > drive removable array and another 4 drive removable array to switch in or > out once a week or so but it just doesn't seem practical. I have no idea how > long it would take to rebuild the array after swapping in a week old set of > drives. I use 250 gig drives with an internal/external pair configured as software RAID1 and it takes about 2 hours to resync the mirror after a swap if the system is fairly idle. I think you can get 500 gig drives now and perhaps if you allow for some of the older backups being on offline drives you could scale down to that. There are also some places that make external cases holding multiple drives that appear as one, but then the sync time will become impractical. You can also do LVM snapshots that you copy to another volume but I think this is broken in Linux 2.6/LVM2. -- Les Mikesell le...@fu... |
From: Casey D. <cas...@vi...> - 2005-11-15 16:55:51
|
Bill, If you are backing up your FreeBSD host, or any FreeBSD host for that matter with tar, you probally want to switch the tar path to /usr/bin/gtar It has been a while, but I recall that the standard FreeBSD tar doesn't support the --newer option that backuppc wants for incrementals. Casey D. Casey Dinsmore Network Administrator ViewPlus Technologies cas...@vi... 541.754.4002 212 Bill Totman wrote: >Hello, > >I'm in the process of setting up BackupPC on FreeBSD 6.0 and was wondering if >anyone had any advice as to special considerations when doing so on FreeBSD. > >Outside of command paths, the only thing I have encountered so far is the lack >of rc.d (init.d) scripts. This is nothing that can't be hacked out by >following the outline of the Linux and Solaris examples in the program >package. > >Thanks for any help, > > |
From: Rich D. <rdu...@th...> - 2005-11-15 16:46:40
|
> I realize I can start over (all my config files are backed up). I could also > put 4 more drives and some controller cards in and rebuild with a raid array > over LVM (probably most sensible). The last option is offsite storage or > external storage or removable storage. I do not belive I have seen an easy > or low cost way using removable drives to rotate a 4 drive array in and out > of the BackupPC machine. Yes, I can envision a 4 drive raid array with a 4 > drive removable array and another 4 drive removable array to switch in or > out once a week or so but it just doesn't seem practical. I have no idea how > long it would take to rebuild the array after swapping in a week old set of > drives. > > In my opinion, this is the only downfall of BackupPC that I have found. Are > there any ideas or solutions that someone has found to guard against failed > hardware. (I am in Florida, just went through a hurricane, and believe that > is the reason the drive failed). Thanks in advance. In a proper disaster recovery plan, you have to be prepared for destruction of your infrastructure -- fire, flood, theft and so on. This means having offsite backup. I have much less data than you, under 80Gb. On my old server, I had a single drive set up with LVM. Then, I would snapshot the drive and sector copy (dd_rescue) the backuppc data to a removable usb drive for offsite storage. I recently set up a new server, and decided to store the backuppc data on a software raid1 mirrored pair, and then use LVM to snapshot it and copy to removable drive. Only problem so far is that I can't seem to snapshot the raid1 pair with evmsn. Since my server goes idle during the day, I simply stop backuppc, unmount the /backup partition, and sector copy. I don't think you will be able to get a removable drive in the size you would need, nor would you be able to get thing copied in a reasonable amount of time. You also have too much data for CD and DVD archive backups. You should probably be considering a fairly hefty tape drive. I can't advise you there, but I'm sure others can. If you have enough bandwidth, there are clustering systems out there that can work over a network cable, that I have seen, but not tried. http://www.it.uc3m.es/~ptb/nbd/ comes to mind. Regards, Rich |
From: Joe H. <joe...@gm...> - 2005-11-15 16:28:45
|
Any reason you didn't do `apt-get install libfile-rsyncp-perl` ? I haven't played with Ubuntu but I do dwell in Debian and am using amd64 for my backuppc server. On 11/15/05, sergio <sr...@re...> wrote: > > i have installed backuppc, and everything seems okay (i can see > everything on the server).. > > i am trying to back up a windows 2000 server via rsync (i got the rsync > from the backuppc site, and everything went fine..) > > when i set up a backup, i get the following error: > > File::RsyncP module doesn't exist.. > > i am running ubuntu for amd64.. > > i used CPAN to install the module, but ran into a ton of compilation > problems.. > > i downloaded the file from CPAN, but ran into the same problem.. > > is there a different build file i need for amd 64? > > thanks! > > -- > ___ > sergio t. ruiz > red red design > 419.207.3927 > www.redreddesign.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today > Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification Exam > for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit: > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D7628&alloc_id=3D16845&op=3Dclick > _______________________________________________ > BackupPC-users mailing list > Bac...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users > http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ > |
From: Carl W. S. <ch...@re...> - 2005-11-15 16:23:33
|
On 11/15 04:06 , Markus Braun wrote: > >what is the start username and password? Did you install from packages or the tarball? I've forgotten what the tarball install is like; but with the Debian package it randomly generates a password. Check the htpasswd file for the username (it's 'backuppc'); and reset the password with the 'htpasswd' tool. -- Carl Soderstrom Systems Administrator Real-Time Enterprises www.real-time.com |
From: Yann <yr...@ap...> - 2005-11-15 16:08:16
|
Hi, I am using BackupPC v2.1.2 I have backed up a machine during the night... When I look at the summary of this machine, I have 13 errors.... If I click on "errors", I can't see any errors.... But if I click on "JournalXfer", I can see my 13 errors : NT_STATUS_DENIED, etc ..... Why does this appears??? Anyone has got this behaviour? Thanks Yann |
From: Markus B. <cha...@ho...> - 2005-11-15 16:07:10
|
Hello? can somebody help me? Thanks markus >From: "Markus Braun" <cha...@ho...> >To: bac...@li... >Subject: [BackupPC-users] Username/passwort >Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:48:57 +0000 > >Hello, > >what is the start username and password? > >Thanks >marcus > >_________________________________________________________________ >Sie suchen E-Mails, Dokumente oder Fotos? Die neue MSN Suche Toolbar mit >Windows-Desktopsuche liefert in sekundenschnelle Ergebnisse. Jetzt neu! >http://desktop.msn.de/ Jetzt gratis downloaden! > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >SF.Net email is sponsored by: >Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. >Download >it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own >Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php >_______________________________________________ >BackupPC-users mailing list >Bac...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users >http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ _________________________________________________________________ Die neue MSN Suche Toolbar mit Windows-Desktopsuche. Suchen Sie gleichzeitig im Web, Ihren E-Mails und auf Ihrem PC! Jetzt neu! http://desktop.msn.de/ Jetzt gratis downloaden! |
From: <da...@br...> - 2005-11-15 16:03:34
|
I run BackupPC on FBSD 5.4. There is /usr/local/etc/rc.d. Scripts in here are executed at boot time. I assume this is true on FBSD 6.0 dayton >>>>> "Bill" == Bill Totman <to...@gm...> writes: Bill> Hello, I'm in the process of setting up BackupPC on FreeBSD 6.0 Bill> and was wondering if anyone had any advice as to special Bill> considerations when doing so on FreeBSD. Bill> Outside of command paths, the only thing I have encountered so far Bill> is the lack of rc.d (init.d) scripts. This is nothing that can't Bill> be hacked out by following the outline of the Linux and Solaris Bill> examples in the program package. Bill> Thanks for any help, -- Bill> Bill Totman to...@gm... Bill> ------------------------------------------------------- This Bill> SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today Bill> Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification Exam for Bill> All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit: Bill> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click Bill> _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users Bill> mailing list Bac...@li... Bill> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Bill> http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ |
From: sergio <sr...@re...> - 2005-11-15 15:46:55
|
i have installed backuppc, and everything seems okay (i can see everything on the server).. i am trying to back up a windows 2000 server via rsync (i got the rsync from the backuppc site, and everything went fine..) when i set up a backup, i get the following error: File::RsyncP module doesn't exist.. i am running ubuntu for amd64.. i used CPAN to install the module, but ran into a ton of compilation problems.. i downloaded the file from CPAN, but ran into the same problem.. is there a different build file i need for amd 64? thanks! -- ___ sergio t. ruiz red red design 419.207.3927 www.redreddesign.com |
From: Chuck W. <ch...@un...> - 2005-11-15 13:11:28
|
I have been using BackupPC for 1 year now to back up approx 32 PC's, Servers, and Laptops. It works very well. We have chosen to keep 6 monthly backups worth of Full, the most recent 4 weeks of Full, and the most recent 4 weeks of Incremental. Over this time, I have ended up with 2 each 250 Gb, 1 each 300 Gb, and 1 each 200 Gb hard drives. I have used approx 800 Gb of these drives. They are setup in an LVM arrangement. One of the 250 Gb drives has bit the dust. I subscribe to this list, read it at least once a day and am now faced with what to do. My backuppc system is not the only source for backup, I use tape drives as the main source of backup. I realize I can start over (all my config files are backed up). I could also put 4 more drives and some controller cards in and rebuild with a raid array over LVM (probably most sensible). The last option is offsite storage or external storage or removable storage. I do not belive I have seen an easy or low cost way using removable drives to rotate a 4 drive array in and out of the BackupPC machine. Yes, I can envision a 4 drive raid array with a 4 drive removable array and another 4 drive removable array to switch in or out once a week or so but it just doesn't seem practical. I have no idea how long it would take to rebuild the array after swapping in a week old set of drives. In my opinion, this is the only downfall of BackupPC that I have found. Are there any ideas or solutions that someone has found to guard against failed hardware. (I am in Florida, just went through a hurricane, and believe that is the reason the drive failed). Thanks in advance. Chuck |
From: [Mailclub] L. B. <l....@ma...> - 2005-11-15 10:58:09
|
[Mailclub] Laurent Bauer wrote: > Hello, > > I have a problem with one particular server whose backup is a bit > strange with only ascii characters in it, see : > http://www.mailclub.fr/tmp/strange_backup.png (...) Sorry, I forgot to mention I changed the options for smb shares, with : $Conf{SmbClientFullCmd} = '$smbClientPath \\\\$host\\$shareName' . ' -p 445' . ' $I_option -U $userName -E -N -d 1' . ' -c tarmode\\ full -Tc$X_option - $fileList'; in global config.pl, and $Conf{SmbClientFullCmd} = '$smbClientPath \\\\$host\\$shareName' . ' $I_option -U $userName -E -N -d 1' . ' -c tarmode\\ full -Tc$X_option - $fileList'; (whithout '-p 445') in this particular config file. I needed to use port 445 for every server except this one, because of our network security and QoS. Laurent |
From: [Mailclub] L. B. <l....@ma...> - 2005-11-15 10:33:58
|
Hello, I have a problem with one particular server whose backup is a bit strange with only ascii characters in it, see : http://www.mailclub.fr/tmp/strange_backup.png Some backups display "normal" filenames. Moreover, with french interface, the accents that are posted to the CGIs do not display well, and you cannot start nor restore backups, I guess it is due to the false URL that is generated. We only have the problem with one NT server, the others (linux or NT) seem OK. Anyboy has a clue ? Thanks Laurent |
From: Regis G. <Reg...@uj...> - 2005-11-15 06:59:23
|
You write: I have seen this before on the list, but never an answer... I backup several WinXP clients and when restoring individual files, neve= r a problem - but when attempting to restore entire backups it "misses" file= s. I haven't determined any kind of pattern, just that it does miss them. I have exactly the same problem. I use the SMB protocol, and restoring individual files works fine, but I can't select all files to restore. Does a solution exist ? Thanks --=20 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D | R=E9gis Gras | http://www-ledss.ujf-grenoble.fr | | L.E.D.S.S. | mailto:Reg...@uj... | | 301, rue de la chimie | -------------- | | DU BP 53 | Tel 04 76 51 41 76 | | 38041 Grenoble Cedex 9 | Fax 04 76 51 40 89 | =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D |
From: Rutger <te...@xs...> - 2005-11-15 05:56:53
|
Hi All, When installing with apt-get install backuppc this wonderfull program onto a Debian Sarge box, everything goes great. After installing and trying to login into backuppc I get this error in my apache-logs after entering my username and password: Premature end of script headers: index.cgi A problem with CGI you should say. The problem is that this is working fine. The problem is that apache wants to run the index.cgi as user "www-data" and backuppc want to have it runned by "backuppc" What is the solution for this problem ? I have googled for 3 hours with a severla of options and also on Gmane, but no direct solution. Here is some commandline-output when running the scipt as www-data and backuppc: # echo " perl /usr/share/backuppc/cgi-bin/index.cgi" | su - backuppc Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 <!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html><head> <title>BackupPC Server Status</title> <link rel=stylesheet type="text/css" href="/backuppc/image/BackupPC_stnd.css" title="CSSFile"> <meta http-equiv="pragma" content="no-cache"> </head><body onLoad="document.getElementById('NavMenu').style.height=document.body.scrollHeight"> <a href="http://backuppc.sourceforge.net"><img src="/backuppc/image/logo.gif" hspace="5" vspace="7" border="0"></a><br> <div id="Content"> <div class="h1">BackupPC Server Status</div> <p> <div class="h2">General Server Information</div> <ul> <li> The servers PID is 8707, on host pc...@do..., version 2.1.2, started at 11/15 06:02. <li> This status was generated at 11/15 06:19. <li> The configuration was last loaded at 11/15 06:02. <li> PCs will be next queued at 11/15 07:00. <li> Other info: <ul> <li>0 pending backup requests from last scheduled wakeup, <li>0 pending user backup requests, <li>0 pending command requests, <li>Pool is 0.00GB comprising files and directories (as of 11/15 06:19), <li>Pool hashing gives repeated files with longest chain , <li>Nightly cleanup removed 0 files of size 0.00GB (around 11/15 06:19), <li>Pool file system was recently at 7% (11/15 05:00), today's max is 7% (11/15 05:00) and yesterday's max was %. </ul> </ul> <div class="h2">Currently Running Jobs</div> <p> <table class="tableStnd" border cellspacing="1" cellpadding="3"> <tr class="tableheader"><td> Host </td> <td> Type </td> <td> User </td> <td> Start Time </td> <td> Command </td> <td align="center"> PID </td> <td align="center"> Xfer PID </td> </tr> </table> <p> <div class="h2">Failures that need attention</div> <p> <table class="tableStnd" border cellspacing="1" cellpadding="3"> <tr class="tableheader"><td align="center"> Host </td> <td align="center"> Type </td> <td align="center"> User </td> <td align="center"> Last Try </td> <td align="center"> Details </td> <td align="center"> Error Time </td> <td> Last error (other than no ping) </td></tr> </table> <br><br><br> </div> <div class="NavMenu" id="NavMenu" style="height:100%"> <div class="NavTitle">Hosts</div> <br> <select onChange="document.location=this.value"> <option value="#">Select a host...</option><option value="?host=localhost">localhost</option> </select> <br><br> <form action="" method="get"> <input type="text" name="host" size="14" maxlength="64"> <input type="hidden" name="action" value="hostInfo"><input type="submit" value="Go" name="ignore"> </form> <div class="NavTitle">Server</div> <a href="" class="NavCurrent">Status</a> <a href="?action=adminOpts">Admin Options</a> <a href="?action=summary">Host Summary</a> <a href="?action=view&type=LOG">LOG file</a> <a href="?action=LOGlist">Old LOGs</a> <a href="?action=emailSummary">Email summary</a> <a href="?action=view&type=config">Config file</a> <a href="?action=view&type=hosts">Hosts file</a> <a href="?action=queue">Current queues</a> <a href="?action=view&type=docs">Documentation</a> <a href="http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/faq">FAQ</a> <a href="http://backuppc.sourceforge.net">SourceForge</a> <br><br><br> </div> </body></html> # echo " perl /usr/share/backuppc/cgi-bin/index.cgi" | su - www-data Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 <!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html><head> <title>BackupPC: Error</title> <link rel=stylesheet type="text/css" href="/backuppc/image/BackupPC_stnd.css" title="CSSFile"> <meta http-equiv="pragma" content="no-cache"> </head><body onLoad="document.getElementById('NavMenu').style.height=document.body.scrollHeight"> <a href="http://backuppc.sourceforge.net"><img src="/backuppc/image/logo.gif" hspace="5" vspace="7" border="0"></a><br> <div id="Content"> <div class="h1">Error: Wrong user: my userid is 33, instead of 110(backuppc) </div> <p>This script needs to run as the user specified in $Conf{BackupPCUser}, which is set to backuppc. <p> This is an installation problem. If you are using mod_perl then it appears that Apache is not running as user backuppc. If you are not using mod_perl, then most like setuid is not working properly on BackupPC_Admin. Check the permissions on /usr/share/backuppc/cgi-bin/BackupPC_Admin and look at the documentation. </p> <br><br><br> </div> <div class="NavMenu" id="NavMenu" style="height:100%"> <form action="" method="get"> <input type="text" name="host" size="14" maxlength="64"> <input type="hidden" name="action" value="hostInfo"><input type="submit" value="Go" name="ignore"> </form> <div class="NavTitle">Server</div> <a href="" class="NavCurrent">Status</a> <a href="?action=adminOpts">Admin Options</a> <a href="?action=summary">Host Summary</a> <a href="?action=view&type=LOG">LOG file</a> <a href="?action=LOGlist">Old LOGs</a> <a href="?action=emailSummary">Email summary</a> <a href="?action=view&type=config">Config file</a> <a href="?action=view&type=hosts">Hosts file</a> <a href="?action=queue">Current queues</a> <a href="?action=view&type=docs">Documentation</a> <a href="http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/faq">FAQ</a> <a href="http://backuppc.sourceforge.net">SourceForge</a> <br><br><br> </div> </body></html> I hope someone is willing to help me ! As faras I know all the right packages are installed, and when Debian needs them and doesn't have them it will automaticly install it. So that should not be the problem. I think it's a user-thing. |
From: Bill T. <to...@gm...> - 2005-11-15 04:30:30
|
Hello, I'm in the process of setting up BackupPC on FreeBSD 6.0 and was wondering if anyone had any advice as to special considerations when doing so on FreeBSD. Outside of command paths, the only thing I have encountered so far is the lack of rc.d (init.d) scripts. This is nothing that can't be hacked out by following the outline of the Linux and Solaris examples in the program package. Thanks for any help, -- Bill Totman to...@gm... |
From: Lorentz H. <lor...@gm...> - 2005-11-15 03:59:30
|
I have seen this before on the list, but never an answer... I backup several WinXP clients and when restoring individual files, never a problem - but when attempting to restore entire backups it "misses" files. I haven't determined any kind of pattern, just that it does miss them. Thanks, Lorentz |
From: Dale R. <dal...@ho...> - 2005-11-15 00:22:50
|
We also have the same issue. We are running GNU tar on Tru64 Unix 5.1A. hostname> /usr/local/bin/tar --version tar (GNU tar) 1.15.1 sample transfer log : Running: /usr/bin/ssh -q -n -l root hostname /usr/local/bin/tar -c --one-file-system -v -f - -C / --totals --newer=2005-11-10\ 19:37:56 . Xfer PIDs are now 7700,7699 /usr/local/bin/tar: ./quota.user: file is unchanged; not dumped /usr/local/bin/tar: ./quota.group: file is unchanged; not dumped .. Dale ----- Original Message ----- From: "Craig Barratt" <cba...@us...> To: "Andrew Grieve" <ag...@uw...> Cc: <bac...@li...> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 3:37 AM Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Re: False Xfer Errors for tar share > Andrew Grieve writes: > >> Hey, thanks for the patch, worked great! I hope this gets incorporated >> into backuppc, as it's quite an easy fix to solve a very annoying problem >> :) > > I still need to understand what version of tar you are using. > GNU tar shouldn't produce these messages. A different version > of tar might not support the same exclude/include syntax, or > have other incompatibilities. > > Craig > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. > Download > it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own > Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php > _______________________________________________ > BackupPC-users mailing list > Bac...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users > http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ > |
From: Markus B. <cha...@ho...> - 2005-11-14 22:49:03
|
Hello, what is the start username and password? Thanks marcus _________________________________________________________________ Sie suchen E-Mails, Dokumente oder Fotos? Die neue MSN Suche Toolbar mit Windows-Desktopsuche liefert in sekundenschnelle Ergebnisse. Jetzt neu! http://desktop.msn.de/ Jetzt gratis downloaden! |
From: Carl W. S. <ch...@re...> - 2005-11-14 22:48:34
|
On 11/10 06:04 , Trey Nolen wrote: > Unfortunately, due to space requirements, we *have* to use compression. Is > there anything I could use on the command line to maybe do a dummy "restore" > and pipe the output through the virus scanner? That would require a ton of > processor work, but it might be OK every now and then. try the BackupPC_tarCreate command; it just creates an uncompressed tar stream to STDOUT. you might be able to pipe that into a virus scanner. -- Carl Soderstrom Systems Administrator Real-Time Enterprises www.real-time.com |
From: Markus B. <cha...@ho...> - 2005-11-14 22:42:35
|
hello, what is the start username and password? Thanks markus _________________________________________________________________ Sie suchen E-Mails, Dokumente oder Fotos? Die neue MSN Suche Toolbar mit Windows-Desktopsuche liefert in sekundenschnelle Ergebnisse. Jetzt neu! http://desktop.msn.de/ Jetzt gratis downloaden! |
From: Carl W. S. <ch...@re...> - 2005-11-14 22:40:54
|
On 11/13 03:58 , Craig Barratt wrote: > It value of the I_option is hardcoded as you see above, but it > should be whatever IP address is returned by nmblookup. So if > $Conf{NmbLookupFindHostCmd} is setup correctly, the -I option should > be set to the correct IP address. Perhaps the Win98 machine isn't > setup to respond to nmblookup muticast requests, or the netmask > doesn't match, etc? Try running $Conf{NmbLookupFindHostCmd} > manually to investigate. yeah, nmblookup and DNS were reporting different values for the machine's IP address. One of them was wrong (I forget which); but that's why I was trying to hard-code the address. -- Carl Soderstrom Systems Administrator Real-Time Enterprises www.real-time.com |
From: Carl W. S. <ch...@re...> - 2005-11-14 22:35:56
|
On 11/13 03:38 , Craig Barratt wrote: > For the next release I plan to decouple BackupPC_dump > and BackupPC_restore from BackupPC_nightly, which will > solve your problem. how are you planning on dealing with the possible race conditions and the like? -- Carl Soderstrom Systems Administrator Real-Time Enterprises www.real-time.com |
From: David R. <dr...@gm...> - 2005-11-14 21:47:32
|
On 11/11/05, Marten van Wezel <bac...@pu...> wrote: > - Im using ssh+tar to backup a remote system to a local dir (not to a > device or compressed archive files) Why not use ssh+rsync to do your backups? That should save a lot more bandwidth than streaming the whole filesystem all the time... -Dave |
From: Patrick F. <pfr...@co...> - 2005-11-14 19:24:44
|
Les Mikesell wrote: >On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 11:51, Paul Fox wrote: > > >>even if the full were to take three days to complete? fulls happen >>after a given number of incrementals, not after a given number of >>days, right? at work we switched to cron for scheduling, for this >>reason. >> >> > >You should get a full run on the first opportunity (backuppc's wakeup >when you haven't already hit a limit on activity) every Conf{FullPeriod} >days regardless of what the incrementals are doing - as long as >$Conf{IncrPeriod} has elapsed since a successful one. The default 6.97 >makes this effectively the same time every week. > > > Ah, thanks for clearing that up - I had the same sort of misunderstanding as Paul, mine being that the full would start $Conf{FullPeriod} days after the last one ended (vs. started), leading it to slew through the week eventually. I suppose it's not an issue until fulls are taking greater than $Conf{FullPeriod} to complete. Eep. And since I sent the initial message off, I looked at the system to see why it's so much data - turns out there's another form of backup occuring that we might be able to nix and save some time and "effort". (Well, probably a DVD-R every month in the archive set, anyway..) I'll keep the cron method in mind in case it does slew (server down for the weekend, etc) just to nail it into place. Thanks! |
From: Les M. <les...@gm...> - 2005-11-14 18:23:54
|
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 11:51, Paul Fox wrote: > > > By some kind > > > of luck it has been starting over the weekend and finishing before we > > > get in on Monday morning. > > > > It is your schedule that causes that, not just luck. If you do 1 full > > a week and start on a weekend, they should stay that way until one > > fails. > > even if the full were to take three days to complete? fulls happen > after a given number of incrementals, not after a given number of > days, right? at work we switched to cron for scheduling, for this > reason. You should get a full run on the first opportunity (backuppc's wakeup when you haven't already hit a limit on activity) every Conf{FullPeriod} days regardless of what the incrementals are doing - as long as $Conf{IncrPeriod} has elapsed since a successful one. The default 6.97 makes this effectively the same time every week. -- Les Mikesell le...@fu... |