Re: [Audacity-translation] [Audacity-quality] [Audacity-devel] 2.0.1?
A free multi-track audio editor and recorder
Brought to you by:
aosiniao
From: Vaughan J. <va...@au...> - 2012-06-11 22:54:39
|
On 6/9/2012 4:48 PM, Martyn Shaw wrote: > Hi there Vaughan > > Thanks for agreeing to RM! You are now God, for a while! :-) > > On 07/06/2012 02:57, Vaughan Johnson wrote: >> Okay, I'm going to be Release Manager for 2.0.1. I'd like to get it out >> by end of June, but I need a summary of where we are, before deciding >> that. > > Just a reminder about what we agreed about the manual > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=29000199 > so I will update > http://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Release_Process#Process step 5, if > that is OK with RM. Yes, please. > > I note that 3.4.5 will have to be after the (to be done) 5.2 ("A test on > the local manual using http://linkchecker.sourceforge.net/ or similar, > ..." needs to be after "running the new script and making the zip > available on http://code.google.com/p/audacity") > > I see that Gale has agreed to testing on-line and local manual and that > James has set himself the task of improving the script for pulling the > manual (although Gale has said the problems are worked-around). > >> I think we do not really need a full two-week freeze, per >> http://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Release_Process#Process item 1. Per >> item 7, I think it's more important to set the freeze date, and go >> through the 48-hour cycle iterations to get to release date. > > Agreed. > >> Please let me know who can do what tasks specified in >> http://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Release_Process#Process item 3. > > I can do the Win exe and zip again. Great, thanks. > > I believe there won't be an ANSI this time? Correct, and I'm planning to purge those configurations from the VS project. - V > > TTFN > Martyn > >> Please make sure that bug priorities are as desired for release. >> >> Also, I've seen posts about new features and their relative >> desirabilities. Do we have a place tracking those, other than this >> thread? Any outside this thread? >> >> Thanks, >> Vaughan >> |