WHATS UP WITH THE  RECORD VOLUME BEING STUCK  WIDE OPEN??????????

> From: audacity-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Audacity-users Digest, Vol 56, Issue 6
> To: audacity-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 22:52:00 +0000
>
> Send Audacity-users mailing list submissions to
> audacity-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> audacity-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> audacity-users-owner@lists.sourceforge.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Audacity-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: converting WAV into WAV DTS (Chopin S?bastien)
> 2. Re: unwanted volume change on export/import (Dave)
> 3. Re: converting WAV into WAV DTS (Bernard)
> 4. Re: converting WAV into WAV DTS (Bernard)
> 5. Re: unwanted volume change on export/import (Tony Carr)
> 6. Re: converting WAV into WAV DTS (Dave)
> 7. Re: VST Installation (v caha)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 01:17:57 +0200
> From: Chopin S?bastien <contact@sebastienchopin.fr>
> Subject: Re: [Audacity-users] converting WAV into WAV DTS
> To: Discussion list for Audacity users
> <audacity-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Message-ID: <4DDD8E25.4090300@sebastienchopin.fr>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Le 26/05/2011 00:29, Lin Sprague a ?crit :
> > On 25 May 2011 at 19:52, Bernard wrote:
> >
> >> Downgrading those audio files into PCM standard did not give very
> >> good results.
> > Not sure what you mean by "PCM standard". If you really mean redbook or
> > CD-quality format, I'd be curious about how you converted your files.
> > The audible difference between 96kHz/32-bit and 44.1kHz/16-bit is not
> > all that great. If your conversion made the files unlistenable, I'd say
> > something went very wrong.
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> Discussion about it is engaged in French here :
> http://fr.groups.yahoo.com/group/audacity-french/
>
> S?bastien
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 23:03:22 +1000
> From: "Dave" <dmc43959@bigpond.net.au>
> Subject: Re: [Audacity-users] unwanted volume change on export/import
> To: "Discussion list for Audacity users"
> <audacity-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Message-ID: <2B7BDDEAF5364D39826F68740A64C9A4@ph>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=original
>
> Hi
> try downloading goldwave and run that ,export as usual and then import into
> goldwave and check level .
> which ever level control you are using for import wind it down low and see
> if audacity responds.
> THANKYOU DAVE M
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tony Carr" <carrt7@gmail.com>
> To: "audacity" <audacity-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 9:24 AM
> Subject: [Audacity-users] unwanted volume change on export/import
>
>
> > (Audacity 3.13.beta, LAME decoder as per manual, Windows7, Dell
> > Inspiron 640m and other computers)
> >
> > When I export a track to mp3, and later import the file back into
> > Audacity, the volume levels have been drastically increased, so that
> > at least some of the track waveform reaches 1.0. I don't know whether
> > this occurs on exporting or importing. I don't know if it is
> > producing clipping.
> >
> > How do I prevent it? (I don't want my files changed without my
> > knowledge - that's why I hate Windows.)
> >
> > I have option "normalize files on import" switched OFF. If I check
> > the box, the next import STILL imports and displays the greatly
> > amplified trace ... and then starts to normalize it.
> >
> > (Yes, I have asked this before - but it's still happening!) Tony
> >
> > --
> > www.godornot.org
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.
> > With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery,
> > you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection.
> > Download your free trial now.
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1
> > *********** ASKING FOR HELP *************
> >
> > When asking for help on this list, please include the following
> > information, so we can
> > help you properly:
> >
> > * What operating system you are using (for example, Windows XP or Mac OS X
> > 10.5.1)
> >
> > * Exactly what three digit version number of Audacity you are using (Help
> > > About
> > Audacity, or Audacity > About Audacity on a Mac computer)
> >
> > * If this is a recording problem, what equipment you are recording with,
> > and how is it
> > connected to the computer?
> >
> > Mailing list: Audacity-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, use the form at the bottom of this web page:
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-users
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 17:50:51 +0200
> From: Bernard <bdebreil@teaser.fr>
> Subject: Re: [Audacity-users] converting WAV into WAV DTS
> To: audacity-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Message-ID: <4DDFC85B.3020801@teaser.fr>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
>
> Thor Andreassen wrote:
> > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 07:52:18PM +0200, Bernard wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >
> >> Would anyone here know whether it is possible to convert 96,000 Hz -
> >> 32-bit float wav files into a suitable lossless WAV-DTS format without
> >> having to resample and downgrade ? If requested, I could propose a
> >> 2-3 min sample for downloading in my web page.
> >>
> >
> > At least for me, a sample of a few seconds would be helpful.
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >
> http://bdebreil.free.fr/SamplePaganini32bit_96KHz.wav
>
> the file is 46 Mb
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 18:05:59 +0200
> From: Bernard <bdebreil@teaser.fr>
> Subject: Re: [Audacity-users] converting WAV into WAV DTS
> To: Discussion list for Audacity users
> <audacity-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Message-ID: <4DDFCBE7.6070601@teaser.fr>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
>
> Lin Sprague wrote:
> > On 25 May 2011 at 19:52, Bernard wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Downgrading those audio files into PCM standard did not give very
> >> good results.
> >>
> >
> > Not sure what you mean by "PCM standard". If you really mean redbook or
> > CD-quality format, I'd be curious about how you converted your files.
> > The audible difference between 96kHz/32-bit and 44.1kHz/16-bit is not
> > all that great. If your conversion made the files unlistenable, I'd say
> > something went very wrong.
> >
> No, this is not unlistenable. At first impression, it sounds OK. Then,
> if you listen next the 96kHz/32-bit file, you find it significantly
> better, and, last of all, when you listen to the old vinyl, it is better
> yet. I would have hard time to describe the difference in written words.
> I would say that sounds are more detailled, more distinct from one
> another in 96kHz/32-bit than in 44.1/16. The files were converted using
> 'audacity 1.3.5 beta' under Debian Lenny. I have used the "normalizing"
> process with good quality dithering, but I first tested other options ;
> since it was done last year, I can't remember all of the details.
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 22:03:06 -0400
> From: Tony Carr <carrt7@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Audacity-users] unwanted volume change on export/import
> To: Discussion list for Audacity users
> <audacity-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Message-ID: <BANLkTikh0YZ_FjLwWyxZgyUBnQYywgx6kg@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> >> When I export a track to mp3, and later import the file back into
> >> Audacity, the volume levels have been drastically increased, so that
> >> at least some of the track waveform reaches 1.0. I don't know whether
> >> this occurs on exporting or importing. I don't know if it is
> >> producing clipping.
>
> > try downloading goldwave and run that ,export as usual and then import into
> > goldwave and check level .
> > which ever level control you are using for import wind it down low and see
> > if audacity responds.
> > ? ?THANKYOU DAVE M
>
> Will do, thanks. For some reason the fault is not occurring this month!
> --
> www.godornot.org
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 23:17:10 +1000
> From: "Dave" <dmc43959@bigpond.net.au>
> Subject: Re: [Audacity-users] converting WAV into WAV DTS
> To: <bdebreil@teaser.fr>, "Discussion list for Audacity users"
> <audacity-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Message-ID: <B840270628DE4E119FAAC267DA44675F@ph>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=original
>
> Hi
> the only PCM Standard that I know is .wav which for Microsoft 41000 to be
> play back on any device. If you stay with 96kHz/32-bit file you are limiting
> yourself to very few players other than the machine you create them on , it
> would be better to pick the right dither and convert to 24bit/16bit 41000 I
> have been told that triangle is a good compromise .
> THANKYOU DAVE M
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bernard" <bdebreil@teaser.fr>
> To: "Discussion list for Audacity users"
> <audacity-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2011 2:05 AM
> Subject: Re: [Audacity-users] converting WAV into WAV DTS
>
>
> > Lin Sprague wrote:
> >> On 25 May 2011 at 19:52, Bernard wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Downgrading those audio files into PCM standard did not give very
> >>> good results.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Not sure what you mean by "PCM standard". If you really mean redbook or
> >> CD-quality format, I'd be curious about how you converted your files.
> >> The audible difference between 96kHz/32-bit and 44.1kHz/16-bit is not
> >> all that great. If your conversion made the files unlistenable, I'd say
> >> something went very wrong.
> >>
> > No, this is not unlistenable. At first impression, it sounds OK. Then,
> > if you listen next the 96kHz/32-bit file, you find it significantly
> > better, and, last of all, when you listen to the old vinyl, it is better
> > yet. I would have hard time to describe the difference in written words.
> > I would say that sounds are more detailled, more distinct from one
> > another in 96kHz/32-bit than in 44.1/16. The files were converted using
> > 'audacity 1.3.5 beta' under Debian Lenny. I have used the "normalizing"
> > process with good quality dithering, but I first tested other options ;
> > since it was done last year, I can't remember all of the details.
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.
> > With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery,
> > you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection.
> > Download your free trial now.
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1
> > *********** ASKING FOR HELP *************
> >
> > When asking for help on this list, please include the following
> > information, so we can
> > help you properly:
> >
> > * What operating system you are using (for example, Windows XP or Mac OS X
> > 10.5.1)
> >
> > * Exactly what three digit version number of Audacity you are using (Help
> > > About
> > Audacity, or Audacity > About Audacity on a Mac computer)
> >
> > * If this is a recording problem, what equipment you are recording with,
> > and how is it
> > connected to the computer?
> >
> > Mailing list: Audacity-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, use the form at the bottom of this web page:
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-users
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 15:51:51 -0700
> From: v caha <gingerale15@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Audacity-users] VST Installation
> To: audacity-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Message-ID: <BANLkTi=+m+dFvHmRZ+9CmK57sP6Fz+r+Jg@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> I still can get these vsts in audacity. I extract, copy in the plugins
> folder, and rescan. This worked succesfully for one vst but not the rest so
> I don't think it is on my handling of the download that it is not working.
> Many times I see it rescanning with the green bar when audacity is restarted
> but it does not show in the effects menu. What does this indicate?
>
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 2:42 PM, <gale@audacityteam.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Sun, 8 May 2011 04:08:26 -0700
> > v caha <gingerale15@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > how about anything on this page
> > http://www.vstplanet.com/Effects/Dynamic.htm
> > >
> > > I would gladly take several from here, but cant even install the first
> > one.
> >
> > I extracted "TLs-Pocket_Limiter.dll" from the zip, placed it in the
> > "plug-ins" folder inside the Audacity installation folder, then
> > launched Audacity. I clicked Edit > Preferences: Effects, put a
> > check mark in "Rescan VST Effects" and made sure there was a
> > check mark in the other two VST boxes on that Preferences sheet.
> >
> > After clicking OK in Preferences and restarting Audacity I saw
> > "TbT v1.2: TLs-Pocket_Limiter" underneath the divider in the
> > Effect menu and used the effect satisfactorily.
> >
> > Endorphin appeared in the menu but does not seem to affect
> > the tracks at all. Not sure why; apparently the previous version
> > did not work with Cakewalk Sonar & DirectiXer. The plug-in
> > doesn't seem to have been developed for nearly 10 years now.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Gale
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 2:50 AM, v caha <gingerale15@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I installed one vst succesfully but failed to install the next 3 vsts.
> > I
> > > > enabled rescan vst, have the vst bridge and vst folder in plugins
> > folder.
> > > > Some of these programs are endorphin, freeverb, and voxengo old school
> > > > verb. Beta 1.3.12 vista, 32 bit notebook. I deleted alot of the extra
> > vsts
> > > > I had from fruit loops.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability
> > What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know.
> > Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools
> > to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters.
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
> > *********** ASKING FOR HELP *************
> >
> > When asking for help on this list, please include the following
> > information, so we can
> > help you properly:
> >
> > * What operating system you are using (for example, Windows XP or Mac OS X
> > 10.5.1)
> >
> > * Exactly what three digit version number of Audacity you are using (Help >
> > About
> > Audacity, or Audacity > About Audacity on a Mac computer)
> >
> > * If this is a recording problem, what equipment you are recording with,
> > and how is it
> > connected to the computer?
> >
> > Mailing list: Audacity-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, use the form at the bottom of this web page:
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-users
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>
> ------------------------------
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Simplify data backup and recovery for your virtual environment with vRanger.
> Installation's a snap, and flexible recovery options mean your data is safe,
> secure and there when you need it. Data protection magic?
> Nope - It's vRanger. Get your free trial download today.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-sfdev2dev
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *********** ASKING FOR HELP *************
>
> When asking for help on this list, please include the following information, so we can
> help you properly:
>
> * What operating system you are using (for example, Windows XP or Mac OS X 10.5.1)
>
> * Exactly what three digit version number of Audacity you are using (Help > About
> Audacity, or Audacity > About Audacity on a Mac computer)
>
> * If this is a recording problem, what equipment you are recording with, and how is it
> connected to the computer?
>
> Mailing list: Audacity-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, use the form at the bottom of this web page:
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-users
>
> End of Audacity-users Digest, Vol 56, Issue 6
> *********************************************