From: Gale Andrews <email@example.com>
To: audacity-quality <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Sunday, December 9, 2012 10:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Audacity-quality] Adjustable Fade effect
| From Steve the Fiddle <email@example.com
| Sun, 9 Dec 2012 21:29:10 +0000
| Subject: [Audacity-quality] Adjustable Fade effect
> I don't think that it is a good use of time to go back over the
> arguments for/against specific features as a great deal of time and
> effort has already gone into achieving a balance between simplicity
> and functionality.
> The only simplification that I can see as a viable option without
> crippling the functionality would be to remove or reduce the number of
> presets, but each included preset has already been argued for, so I am
> inclined to retain the current list at least until we receive a
> reasonable amount of user feedback, which means making the plug-in
> available to a large number of users.
Again, I agree.
> Regarding "is it too complex for general release", it is arguably less
> complex than several effects that are currently part of the general
> release (Compressor, Click Track, Equalization, Auto Duck, Vocoder,
> Noise Removal, GVerb,....)
The only way I can see to make it more intuitive would be to make
it a C++ effect. In many ways that would be even better and would
solve the accessibility problems David and I have pointed out.
However a new C++ effect would duplicate a lot of work that has
already been done. It may be better to ship the Nyquist adjustable
fade, which gives us a chance to find out for real what is good and
bad about it, and perhaps build on that experience later to make a
> There have been a number of excellent suggestions for improving this
> effect which are unfortunately beyond the current capabilities of
Nyquist plug-ins. These will certainly be worth keeping in mind for
> when either, the Audacity Nyquist plug-in interface is enhanced, or an
> Adjustable Fade is programmed as a built-in effect. In the mean time I
> think that this plug-in offers a substantial benefit over the current
> Cross Fade In/Out plug-ins.
I'm in agreement with removing Cross Fade In and Cross Fade Out
(though I actually use them as my preferred fades) but only if
they remain as a preset. To remind again, the slider cannot
produce the Cross Fade shape.
> Regarding the "long tail" on the exponential fade out - This fade
> remain audible for considerably longer than applying an exponential
> fade to silence than when using the Envelope Tool. For people that
> like to listen to their music reasonably loud, the sound remains
> clearly audible for at least 90% of the fade out duration. There is
obviously a matter of taste concerning how long the tail should be,
> and that is why this is primarily an *Adjustable Fade* effect. That
> particular preset is just one of an infinite number of presets shapes
> that individual users may prefer. IF user feedback demonstrates a
> strong preference for the Exponential Fade Out to be less curved
> (higher mid-fade) then we can easily change it (lines 68 and 69).
Whatever. I just sensed a possible "imbalance" with the pair of
> Regarding users that might think that the "dB" option is a "target", I
> have added the word "Gain", so now we have the options:
> Start/End as: % of Original
> Start/End as: dB Gain
> Typo "Exponential Out" now corrected.
> On 9 December 2012 20:11, Gale Andrews <firstname.lastname@example.org
> > If you recall Peter, I would have preferred not to have presets,
> > but have more fade types (so we don't get controls disabled).
> > That was what I was asking "more time to consider". Then the
> > mid fade slider and the gain controls "adjust" whatever shape
> > the preset produces.
> > But this has problems in Nyquist because conceptually you
> > might expect e.g. choosing an EQ power type of preset to
> > move the slider automatically. And some presets might as I
> > understand it produce a shape the slider can't control.
> > We know that a lot of users who have been asking for partial
> > fades are not technically accomplished. I think the mid-fade
> > slider is what they will struggle with.
> > A
separate "Fade Selector" (as I understand it) would not
> > allow partial fades, leaving people who want these to use a
> > "complicated" effect. It would also create an additional effect
> > when we are trying to rationalise fades.
> > Power users may use the keyboard as well as the mouse -
> > it would probably be quicker to tab to an adjacent control
> > than use the mouse.
> > Either way I think Adjustable Fade is still a reasonable compromise
> > even as it is now that has "something for everyone" in a single
> > effect.
> > Gale
> > | From Peter Sampson <email@example.com
> > | Sun, 9 Dec 2012 03:10:19 -0800 (PST)
> > | Subject:
[Audacity-quality] Adjustable Fade effect
> >> Martyn wrote:
> >> >Overall, A fully-featured effect, but is it too complicated for
> >> >main-stream? I don't know, as yet.
> >> 1) Adjustable Fade
> >> ===============
> >> What has made this "fully-featured (over-featured imo) is the
> >> addition of the presets. The earlier versions of this effect that
> >> I tested for Steve did not have the presets - they were added
> >> quite recently.
> >> The real problem that I have with the presets in "Adjustable
> >> Fade" is that they remove the "adjustability" - as use of any of
> >> the presets inhibit use of the other controls - actually they
> >> inhibit the operation of the controls by the effect but due to the
> >> limitations of
Nyquist they can't be made visually inoperable
> >> by graying them out.
> >> Accordingly I would vote for removing the presets so that
> >> "Adjustable Fade" can "do what it says on the tin" - and at the
> >> same time look less intimidating to the user (it would remain an
> >> extremely powerful effect though).
> >> Even simplified like this it may remain too complicated for the
> >> average mainstream user as Martyn suggests (I, personally,
> >> probably will never need to use it) but we should consider the
> >> power-users too of whom there are plenty in the Audacity user-base.
> >> If the presets were to remain in Adjustable Fade then I would
> >> argue *strongly* for retaining them at the bottom of the effect dialog
> >> as the "adjustable" part of an
Adjustable Fade" should have precedence
> >> over the "selectable" and "non-adjustable" part - but this would definitely
> >> be a sub-optimal solution for me.
> >> 2) Fade Selector
> >> =============
> >> I do fully acknowledge that preset fade types are likely to be
> >> extremely useful and indeed many people, including Gale, would
> >> probably use them in preference to an Adjustable Fade.
> >> What I suggest we consider then is creating a new tool which
> >> enables the user to select and apply a fade shape - the presets
> >> which currently sit in v30d of Adjustable Fade - and maybe
> >> even add some more.
> >> Such an effect could be called "Selectable Fade" or "Fade Selector"
> >> or any similar name TBD.
> >> This would then easily facilitate the TAB use that Gale describes.
> >> 3) One-click fades
> >> ==============
> >> In doing this I would definitely *not* want us to lose the facility
> >> of a one-click simple fade, as with the current linear Fade In & Fade
> >> out - and the new Pro-Fade (committed currently as "One-click Fade
> >> out").
> >> The facility to effect this on your audio selection with a single click is far
> >> too powerful a tool lo lose. It would be tedious in the extreme to have to
> >> access those fades by a "Fade Selector" as proposed above,
> >> necessitating at least two clicks and maybe more - but they could still be
> >> additionally included in the "Fade Selector". Indeed the "Fade Selector"
>> could even include secondary access to "Adjustable Fade"
> >> My 2c worth.
> >> Peter.
> >> Peter Sampson
> >> Tel: +44 (0)1625 524 780
> >> Mob: +44 (0)7732 278 299
> >> From: Gale Andrews <firstname.lastname@example.org
> >> To: audacity-quality <email@example.com
> >> Sent: Saturday, December 8, 2012 11:53 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [Audacity-quality] Adjustable Fade effect
> >> | From Steve the Fiddle <firstname.lastname@example.org
> >> | Fri, 7 Dec 2012 15:25:46 +0000
> >> | Subject: [Audacity-quality] Adjustable Fade effect
> >> > As promised, the "Adjustable Fade" effect.
> >> >
> >> > The documentation is not complete yet, but it's well on the way:
> >> > http://manual.audacityteam.org/man/User:PeterSampson/Adjustable_Fade
> >> Thanks again, Steve. My 2p's.
> >> For my usage (I would mainly use presets), the presets
> >> aren't "handy" at the bottom for repetitive usage unless
> >> I am going to use a mouse. To change a preset, or change
> >> from using a preset to using the controls, it's four
> >> SHIFT + TAB's, or
> >> If the presets were first, those who mainly use the controls
> >> only need one TAB to get into the controls (and don't need
> >> to TAB to change to using a preset).
> >> I'm not convinced that in reality it's more confusing when
> >> presets are first that controls are ignored when presets
> >> are on.
> >> So while I can live with presets at the bottom, my view for
> >> actually using the effect comfortably is that they would be
> >> better at the top (the default could still be "None Selected"
> >> as now).
> >> This assumes most people are going to use presets which I
> >> think is a reasonable assumption. At least I don't think such
> >> people should be made to work four or six times harder when
>> using they keyboard.
> >> Other points:
> >> * The "Exponential" presets have a very long tail - do we need
> >> that?
> >> * I think "Gain" or "Change" or some word should be added to
> >> the three Start and/or End controls. Otherwise, those who
> >> want a fade to a "target" level might be thinking this is it
> >> if they change to "dB" :=)
> >> * Typo "ExponentialOut" (no space) in the presets.
> >> Gale
LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial
Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support
Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more
Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivershttp://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d
Audacity-quality mailing listAudacityemail@example.com://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-quality