From: Eric B. <eb...@ho...> - 2006-11-18 16:34:46
|
> I was misunderstood (or I wrote some BS)). > > Status 3 is "write to Spam-Folder" > > In order to discard >>Bayesian Non Spam > , it should be empty (or 4 and filepath = empty) > > Later on it may be ok to store >>Bayesian Non Spam > into the "Not Spam Folder". > That can be accomplished by setting the status to 4 and the filepath > of >>Bayesian Non Spam > to "Notspam". I guess I'm still confused a little here. I'm not entirely sure I understand what a MailOK message is. From my understanding, a mailOK msg is a non-spam message. Something that has cleared the RBLs, any black/red lists/regexs, passed Bayesian tests, etc. On the Wiki, Michael states: "...mailok messages are not necessarily ham, and are in-fact typically rated spam - otherwise they would be in the ham folder. Messages that are mailok have been isolated from the ham for a reason, but are intentionally not considered spam and should not add to the spam corpus." Which confuses me even further. If my understanding is correct, and mailok msgs have indeed cleared all spam tests, then why should they not be considered as ham? Thanks! Eric |