Re: [j-devel] RETURN handled differently in interpreted and compiled code

[XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX]

Thanks! I've filed this as issue #23.

Bye,

Erik.

On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 12:04 AM, Robert Dodier <rob...@ya...> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> See below for foobar.lisp.
>
> Interpreted:
> (foobar)
>  =>
> HELLO 1
> NIL
>
>
> Compiled:
> (foobar)
>  =>
> HELLO 1
> HELLO 2
> T
>
>
> I'm no expert on the CL spec so I don't know which is correct.
> But I think Maxima expects the behavior shown by interpreted code here.
>
> Thanks for your attention to this.
>
> Robert Dodier
>
> PS.
> $ cat foobar.lisp
> (defun blurf () nil)
>
> (defun foobar ()
>  (prog (x y z)
>        (declare (ignore x y z))
>        ((lambda (a b)
>           (declare (ignore a b))
>           (format t "HELLO 1~%")
>           (cond ((not (blurf)) (return nil))))
>         nil nil)
>        (format t "HELLO 2~%")
>        (return t)))
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> armedbear-j-devel mailing list
> arm...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/armedbear-j-devel
>