[Archetypes-users] SQLstorage staus

[Grant M. <gr...@ry...>]

In the Archetypes Developers Guide it says

SQLStorage is newer than Archetypes itself, and does not appear to be as 
soundly developed and tested. In email to me, Alan Runyan said that:

NOTE: SQLStorage is incredibly inefficient. It works quite well and we 
have done a project with it (that why it exists). But really it should 
be rewritten if you are going to use it in a very large scale production 
environment. I would consider the implementation 'alpha' but stable.

This note seems to be about 1 1/2 years old, is this still true?

Cheers,
Grant Morgan