Just Launched: You can now import projects and releases from Google Code onto SourceForge
We are excited to release new functionality to enable a 1-click import from Google Code onto the Allura platform on SourceForge. You can import tickets, wikis, source, releases, and more with a few simple steps. Read More
Hi Davide -
The solvation energy is dependent both on the size of the coarse grid and the resolution (grid spacing) of the fine grid. I would recommend adjusting the resolution of the fine grid as well to see how this affects your results.
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
From: Davide Mercadante [mailto:dmer018@...]
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 1:26 PM
Subject: [Apbs-users] Resolution of the coarse grid doesn't change the calculated energy in focusing calculations
Dear APBS users,
I have performed a series of focusing calculations (mg-manual) by setting a first coarse grid of dime 65 x 65 x 65 and various glen of 300^3, 250^3, 200^3 and 150^3.
The dimensions of the fine grid are the same and the glen are fixed in the three dimensions at 110.
However, I have noticed that the calculated energy remains the same if I change the glen of the coarse grid leaving the glen of the fine grid fixed.
I thought that being a focusing calculation the resolution of the coarse grid should affect the fine grid and therefore the energy calculated.
I attach the file in the mail. Please note that the argument DIME for the keyword glen of the course grid has just be set for a script to recognize different values of glen for the coarse grid.
Can you please help me to understand why this happens and if I am wrong somewhere setting my calculations?
Any help will be highly appreciated.
Davide Mercadante - PhD student -
Department of Chemistry
The University of Auckland
Rm 438 ext. 89171
1142 Auckland, New Zealand