Re: [aopalliance-discuss] Proposal: Dual-license the AOP Alliance API Public Domain and Apache 2

[James C. <ja...@ca...>]

No objections here. +1 all the way!
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 8:32 PM Bob Lee <cra...@cr...> wrote:

> AOP Alliance contributors,
>
> Last week, an AOP Alliance API user reached out to me because their legal
> team took issue with our Public Domain "license." You might recall this
> same issue coming up a couple times before
> <http://sourceforge.net/p/aopalliance/mailman/search/?q=license>. For a
> summary of the issue, see the Open Source Initiative FAQ
> <http://opensource.org/faq#public-domain>.
>
> To remedy this situation, I propose that we keep the existing Public
> Domain "license" but also add an Apache 2 license (i.e. an actual license).
> Specifically, I would update the AOP Alliance home page to say that AOP
> Alliance is also licensed under Apache 2 (the same license used by Spring,
> JSR-330, Guice, etc.).
>
> Any objections? I suspect there won't be any because this doesn't actually
> affect the intended rights of our users.
>
> Thanks,
> Bob
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> aopalliance-discuss mailing list
> aop...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aopalliance-discuss
>