Thread: [Aoetools-discuss] vblade-8 still requires typedef declaration
Brought to you by:
ecashin,
elcapitansam
From: Andrei L. <an...@la...> - 2005-11-12 08:49:56
|
Hi, I've just downloaded vblade-8 and it still requires to add "typedef unsigned long long u64;" in config.h to compile on Slackware 10.2. Why not to add this line permanently? I've seen that there is another protocol called NDAS which seems similar to AOE. What's the main difference (except that NDAS is not GPL)? I've started to play with AOE just a week ago and I find it easy to use and very promising. Now I'm making an AOE-server which boots from CF to use like a buckup server. Thank you very much for a great tool! Andrei -- Lan.Art s.r.l. via Co' del Panico 35028 Piove di Sacco (PD) tel. 049-7966424 fax 049-7966600 http://www.lanart.it |
From: Ed L C. <ec...@co...> - 2005-11-14 16:23:33
|
Andrei Levin <an...@la...> writes: > Hi, > > I've just downloaded vblade-8 and it still requires to add "typedef > unsigned long long u64;" in config.h to compile on Slackware 10.2. Why > not to add this line permanently? I think that Slackware is the odd man out in this respect. I think that because different systems have different typedefs I'll add simple tests like autoconf uses. I think autoconf itself is overkill, though. > I've seen that there is another protocol called NDAS which seems > similar to AOE. What's the main difference (except that NDAS is not > GPL)? Would you mind asking this question of in...@co...? > I've started to play with AOE just a week ago and I find it easy to > use and very promising. Now I'm making an AOE-server which boots from > CF to use like a buckup server. Thank you very much for a great tool! You're welcome (on behalf of several Coraid employees and of other contributors outside of Coraid.) -- Ed L Cashin <ec...@co...> |