From: Christian R. <c...@ro...> - 2010-12-30 16:35:26
|
> With some of my preliminary testing of -pre12 upon issuing the "amavisd > reload" command I see the old child processes lingering around in a > "<defunct>" state. I can confirm this. Reloading leaves <defunct> processes. amavis 6104 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z 06:43 0:04 amavisd <defunct> amavis 6351 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z Dec29 0:02 amavisd <defunct> amavis 6382 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z Dec29 0:10 amavisd <defunct> amavis 6404 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z Dec29 0:07 amavisd <defunct> amavis 8275 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z Dec29 0:09 amavisd <defunct> amavis 26141 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z Dec29 0:08 amavisd <defunct> amavis 29051 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z 07:35 0:02 amavisd <defunct> amavis 30049 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z 11:27 0:01 amavisd <defunct> amavis 30817 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z Dec29 0:05 amavisd <defunct> amavis 31982 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z Dec29 0:14 amavisd <defunct> Christian |