From: Ryan B. <rmb...@cs...> - 1999-02-03 09:01:51
|
Shandara Tyriss wrote: > and then tried to get to some of the data like this: > > draw_sprite (Buffer, ((BITMAP *)Data[spritegraphic].dat, 160, 100); This cast is unecessary. > it works fine, but if I tried to get to: > > (BITMAP *)Data[spritegraphic].dat->w Use ((BITMAP *)Data[spritegraphic].dat)->w Or BITMAP *ptr = Data[spritegraphic].dat; .. ptr->w -- Ryan Bright >From <all...@ma...> Wed Feb 03 01:10:55 1999 Received: from imo12.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.2] by mail.canvaslink.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-4.06) id A86D8910122; Wed, 03 Feb 1999 01:10:53 DT Received: from Xlo...@ao... by imo12.mx.aol.com (IMOv18.1) id EXYLa04796 for <al...@ma...>; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 01:10:30 -0500 (EST) From: Xlo...@ao... Message-ID: <695...@ao...> Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 01:10:30 EST To: al...@ma... Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [AL] Serious bug in rotate_sprite() corrected! Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 4 Precedence: bulk Sender: all...@ma... Reply-To: al...@ma... X-UIDL: 905450816 Status: O Content-Length: 631 Lines: 11 In a message dated 2/2/99 12:00:40 PM Pacific Standard Time, Sh...@ta... writes: > What do you all think? Should I leave the code alone, in which case it > won't work on SB PCI cards, or change it so that it will work on these > boards, but risk the potential for problems with other hardware that I > don't currently know about? Of course this could be made a config > option, but 99% of users will never bother to run the setup program, so > unfortunately that doesn't help in the majority of cases... > make it standard, (correct me if i'm wrong) but isn't the soundblaster 16 almost standard for all cards? >From <all...@ma...> Wed Feb 03 01:16:39 1999 Received: from imo25.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.69] by mail.canvaslink.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-4.06) id A9C59600C0; Wed, 03 Feb 1999 01:16:37 DT Received: from Xlo...@ao... by imo25.mx.aol.com (IMOv18.1) id 6SCLa20271 for <al...@ma...>; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 01:16:02 -0500 (EST) From: Xlo...@ao... Message-ID: <263...@ao...> Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 01:16:02 EST To: al...@ma... Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [AL] [Allegro Mailing List - Daily Digest] Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 4 Precedence: bulk Sender: all...@ma... Reply-To: al...@ma... X-UIDL: 905450817 Status: O Content-Length: 310 Lines: 7 In a message dated 2/2/99 3:16:27 PM Pacific Standard Time, ar...@ww... writes: > I too agree with him. Considering that name calling is a breach of > "netiquette" and is also simply rude (especially to someone who you hardly > know), I also think that most other list members would agree. > i agree >From <all...@ma...> Wed Feb 03 01:17:16 1999 Received: from imo12.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.2] by mail.canvaslink.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-4.06) id A9E9D7C00C6; Wed, 03 Feb 1999 01:17:13 DT Received: from Xlo...@ao... by imo12.mx.aol.com (IMOv18.1) id UETMa04796 for <al...@ma...>; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 01:17:00 -0500 (EST) From: Xlo...@ao... Message-ID: <e46...@ao...> Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 01:17:00 EST To: al...@ma... Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [AL] DZComm question Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 4 Precedence: bulk Sender: all...@ma... Reply-To: al...@ma... X-UIDL: 905450818 Status: O Content-Length: 232 Lines: 5 In a message dated 2/2/99 3:28:14 PM Pacific Standard Time, sto...@in... writes: > send less data. you are probably sending more data than needed. also, > recieved this e-mail like 6 times. whats's the prob? me too >From <all...@ma...> Wed Feb 03 01:18:36 1999 Received: from imo21.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.65] by mail.canvaslink.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-4.06) id AA39D8300C6; Wed, 03 Feb 1999 01:18:33 DT Received: from Xlo...@ao... by imo21.mx.aol.com (IMOv18.1) id AHFYa07798 for <al...@ma...>; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 01:17:47 -0500 (EST) From: Xlo...@ao... Message-ID: <bab...@ao...> Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 01:17:47 EST To: al...@ma... Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [AL] Unsigned/Signed Sound?? Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 4 Precedence: bulk Sender: all...@ma... Reply-To: al...@ma... X-UIDL: 905450819 Status: O Content-Length: 301 Lines: 9 In a message dated 2/2/99 3:36:09 PM Pacific Standard Time, sto...@in... writes: > also, how about we all do some sort of petition? there is plenty of people > for > that and it might work (not saying it will, but it's open ideas, right?). > would > do you think? > i'd sign it!! >From <all...@ma...> Wed Feb 03 01:19:59 1999 Received: from imo25.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.69] by mail.canvaslink.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-4.06) id AA8DD8A00C6; Wed, 03 Feb 1999 01:19:57 DT Received: from Xlo...@ao... by imo25.mx.aol.com (IMOv18.1) id NHOLa20295 for <al...@ma...>; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 01:19:44 -0500 (EST) From: Xlo...@ao... Message-ID: <94a...@ao...> Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 01:19:44 EST To: al...@ma... Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [AL] [Allegro Mailing List - Daily Digest] Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 4 Precedence: bulk Sender: all...@ma... Reply-To: al...@ma... X-UIDL: 905450820 Status: O Content-Length: 284 Lines: 5 In a message dated 2/2/99 4:56:59 PM Pacific Standard Time, sav...@mi... writes: > And what's so wrong with being in school? I know plenty of kids that attend > my school who don't go around calling people mindless idiots.. :) oh no not more politicolly correct stuff!! >From <all...@ma...> Wed Feb 03 01:49:04 1999 Received: from mail.comtrust.ro [193.226.63.2] by mail.canvaslink.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-4.06) id A15AA0500F0; Wed, 03 Feb 1999 01:48:58 DT Received: from mail2 ([193.226.63.4]) by mail.comtrust.ro (Netscape Mail Server v2.02) with SMTP id AAA44 for <al...@ma...>; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 08:48:50 +0200 Message-ID: <00af01be4f41$a477dd60$043...@ma...> From: co...@co... (GCT Sulea Cosmin) To: <al...@ma...> Subject: Re: [AL] Sound problem! Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 08:51:36 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Precedence: bulk Sender: all...@ma... Reply-To: al...@ma... X-UIDL: 905450821 Status: O Content-Length: 556 Lines: 19 >> After I've installed Allegro 3.1, the timers works fine but the sound >> works only if I make a allegro.cfg and specify my midi device as MPU (my >> sound card is OPL3). >> >> Cosmin. > >this is quite normal. most emulation programs for PCIs do not do the Adlib >stuff right. it normally detects Adlib, but MPU is usually the best choice. >maybe this could be fixed to (autodetect MPU before Adlib?)? > >~ST~ > I've solved it with a configuration file and now with autodetec it detects MPU. Thanks to all who helped me ! Cosmin. |