All IM[NS]HO, of course.
In the 'SF Policy on Reply-To Munging'
statement, SF is essentially forcing
all projects to abide by the SF
opinion -- regardless of whether the
people involved in a particular project
all want it that way or not.
That sucks. Just plain sucks.
Fine, make Reply-to munging default
to off -- but don't fascistically force
the SF *opinion* on open developers
whose opinions may differ.
The argument that 'all SF mailing
lists should behave the same way'
I consider rubbish. How many
subscribers to SF lists are on more
The document appears to clearly
state 'this is how we think it should
be, so we're going to make you do
things that way' -- which is so patently
contrary to the whole concept of open
development that I cringe.
I call upon you to permit reply-to
munging on a project-by-project
basis; let them determine their
own destiny and preferences rather
than forcing yours on them.