Please keep it lite!

2005-08-08
2013-04-11
  • darin vanatta
    darin vanatta
    2005-08-08

    Don't be tempted to add any more functionality.  Keep it under 100k so it can be truly be lite.  It's on its way to being plump by version 1.0.

    thanks for your work.

     
    • Mark Dickenson
      Mark Dickenson
      2005-08-08

      That is my goal to keep it under 100k.  The initial release was 90k and then dropped as I found more efficient ways to code the functions.It has slowly creeped up to 100k as new things have been added.

      I will not be adding anything new to the standard code unless it is absolutely necessary and I will still be looking at ways to shrink the size a little more.

      The next step I am going to work on are the caching drivers. Those are totally seperate drivers and will be larger.

      So don't worry, the package will stay at 100k or lower if I have anything to say about it. :)

       
    • Mark Dickenson
      Mark Dickenson
      2005-08-08

      BTW, the next version is already 5-6k smaller without losing any of the commands or features. ;)