Re: [Acx100-users] Re: Bug ?

[Denis V. <vd...@il...>]

On Thursday 06 October 2005 16:25, Jason Grant wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 13:50 +0300, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> > Well, we have very scarce info on acx protocol,
> > and what we have is contradictory in places.
> 
> OK then, I'll give it a go tomorrow & report back.
> 
> > What leak? We have statically allocated tx buffers.
> 
> Not a memory leak, I meant a possible 'tx descriptor' leak, and yes, it
> can only occur to the point where the ring buffer is saturated, which is
> what I'm seeing.  When the driver is working OK, the ACXDONE bit is
> being reset, however the fault that I'm encountering involves this bit
> not being reset.  Anyway, the idea about such a leak is only speculation
> - another possibility is general queue overflow as mentioned earlier.

BTW, consider lowering this:

#define TX_CNT 32

to 16 or even 8
--
vda