|
Re: [Ikvm-developers] IKVM performance question
From: Michael Kay <mike@sa...> - 2008-12-18 15:19
Attachments: HTML-Email.html |
Sounds good to me! For Saxon I generally reckon the .NET code is slower than the native Java equivalent by a factor of 1.2 to 1.5 - but that's on a fairly limited sample. The .NET code has much faster warm-up time, so it's faster overall for small jobs. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ _____ From: Alberto Diez [mailto:adiezolivan@gmail.com] Sent: 18 December 2008 14:19 To: ikvm-developers@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Ikvm-developers] IKVM performance question Dear all, I have tried the IKVM tool with the Java library weka.jar; I have generated the corresponding weka.dll and I have tried out some algorithms under .NET framework (C#, Visual Studio 2005) with really surprising results: it works better (it builds models faster and with less-consuming memory) than under Java (Eclipse framework and directly under command prompt, with the jdk-jre 1.6.03 installed)! I wonder if this is normal or I am doing something wrong... Thanks in advance. Kind regards, Alberto. |
Copyright © 2010 Geeknet, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms of Use