The installer doesn't have much CVS history that will be lost, right? If
that is the case, I'm fine (actually quite happy) with the proposed
structure.
-Frank
On 10/24/05, Oti <ohumbel@...> wrote:
>
> Brian, Frank,
>
> it is an outstanding requirement from Brian to restructure the
> installer project. For me the time would now be ideal, because
> - the installer has a clean shape right now (3 ways with equal
> possibilities: gui, console and silent installation)
> - there are some outstanding checkins which are worth tracking (e.g.
> introduction of Runtime.exec() for chmod and validation of an external
> JDK).
>
> So the proposed structure is:
>
> OLD:
> /installer
> /org
> /python ...
>
>
> NEW:
> /installer
> /src
> /java
> /org
> /python ...
>
> with the possibility to add sources different than java, and to add a
> test folder at the same level like src.
>
> go or no go ?
>
> Thanks very much for your feedback,
> Oti.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc.
> Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course
> Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005
> Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information
> _______________________________________________
> Jython-dev mailing list
> Jython-dev@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-dev
>
|