On 11/11/05, Reed Hedges <reed@...> wrote:
> Brian Gerkey wrote:
> > It would probably be easiest to port the current C++
> > lib, maybe using the old port as a guide. I don't do Windows
> > development, but I would guess that it shouldn't be too much work
> > beyond setting up a Makefile and what not. C++ is C++, right?
> Yeah, especially if you are using GCC on Windows (I like MinGW and MSYS m=
> but Cygwin is another option), but you have to make networking and thread=
> WinSock is mostly like Linux but not exactly, and can be a bit of a pain.
Why not use cygwin?