MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows

None here.

Yeah, I know, haven't seen or heard anything from me in months.  For whatever it is worth, I do apologize.  I have, 
however, been following Mingw and Msys as closely as I can.

	I am sure I can easily attribute this lapse of response to the fact that I have been a member of a new (so-
called) class called the "working poor", a class that has only come into existence in the last four years or so in the 
US.  Got to keep food on the table and a roof over my head...

In all honesty, I was wondering when we would be able to add X11 license to the Win32api.  Danny summed up my 
concerns.

Paul G.

On 29 Sep 2004 at 22:30, Earnie Boyd wrote:

> Danny Smith wrote:
> 
> >From: "Earnie Boyd"
> >| Any heartache with adding X11 license to the w32api distribution?
> >
> >No heartaches, stomachaches, headaches tonight.
> >
> > I didn't realize you could cavalierly  change licencing without
> >consent from _all_ persons who made significant contributions to a
> >work.
> >  
> >
> That depends on if the copyright was assigned or not which is another
> reason we can't use LGPL.  Cygwin would have a heart attack because
> Redhat wouldn't own the copyright.
> 
> Earnie
> 
> -- 
> http://www.mingw.org
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw
> https://sourceforge.net/donate/index.php?user_id=15438
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on
> ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you
> think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift
> Certificates! Click to find out more
> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
> _______________________________________________ MinGW-dvlpr mailing
> list MinGW-dvlpr@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-dvlpr