Daniel Barlow wrote:
>6) This is a milestone but is not by any means news of impending
>completion: there's still a whole lot of stuff to do before I'd
>consider it ready to be let out. If people are interested in seeing
>it, I'll stick up a diff (against something in the region of 0.7.1.45,
>as it happens); if people are interested in collaborating (in
>particular, volunteers to write and test register saving vops on
>sparc, and do general porting stuff for x86) then I'm going to have to
>figure out something with CVS. Bill, how would you feel about
>allowing creation of a thread branch in the sourceforge cvs, if this
I've just been hacking the old cmucl threading code back together to
allow McCLIM to work, however I'd prefer a less horrible threading solution.
If this is up to par with the functionality of the cmucl threading
system, then I'd be quite interested getting it to run under x86, since
I'm only dealing with the existing system to facilitate McCLIM.