On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 04:53:11PM -0500, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
> On Thursday 17 October 2002 16:45, Scott Russell wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 04:41:12PM -0500, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
> > > On Thursday 17 October 2002 16:31, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > I know :) That's why I think it should be a "only replay log"
> > > > option to fsck instead of a standalone util.
> > >
> > > Okay. I agree. I was just making sure I understood. -l conflicts
> > > with an e2fsck flag though. Maybe -O (opposite of -o).
> > -0 and -O look very similar on a tty. Avoid -0 or -O IMHO.
> Good point. Both -p and -n together (or -a and -n)?
If it's an 'obscure' option then the way to handle is to use a long
opt only I think. fsck.jfs --something. That way there is no confusion
and a user won't 'accidentally' invoke it.
just my 0.2
Scott Russell (lnxgeek@...)
Linux Technology Center, System Admin, RHCE.
Dial 877-735-8200 then ask for 919-543-9289 (TTY)