>>> <klaus.berndl@...> seems to think that:
>> I think a good starting point is the definition of the several elisp-
>> parsers in semantic-el.el - we should at least have one code-exemplar
>> for each of them.
>> I had already started with a test.el but not yet finished - i will =
>> to you today evening, Eric, then you can maybe save some time ;-)
>here is my test.el i mentioned - as already said, just a start...
[ ... ]
I checked in a copy of test.el based on what you wrote. It detected
bugs in the lisp parser, so I checked in a new version of that too.
Eric Ludlam: zappo@..., eric@...
Home: http://www.ludlam.net Siege: http://www.siege-engine.com
Emacs: http://cedet.sourceforge.net GNU: http://www.gnu.org