|
[CEDET-devel] RE: Re[3]: Thoughts for semantic-regtest.el
From: <klaus.berndl@sd...> - 2005-02-15 17:06
|
Hi, Eric M. Ludlam wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Your changes make good sense Klaus. i have now checked in a new version of semantic-regtest.el - patch has been sent to this list before... This new version contains a new function semantic-regtest-excessive-trim = which is needed by this lib but IMO it is a utility-function which = should be placed somewhere else in the cedet-suite - what is a good place for = such general utilities like trimming functions?? Ciao, Klaus |
| Thread | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| [CEDET-devel] RE: Re[3]: Thoughts for semantic-regtest.el | <klaus.berndl@sd...> |