On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 21:19:43 +0200, David Ponce wrote:
> > That seems like a pretty clever idea. It might stand seperate from
> > working, however. Working is supposed to be busy meter type stuff, where
> > this is message management. Working might choose to use bits of this.
> > A really cool feature would be if some classes of messages that were not
> > shown in the minibuffer were still placed in the message log. That could
> > be useful since if something went *boom*, you could check what was going on
> > after the fact.
> Yes that would be a cool feature. In fact it could be the default
> behavior for disabled levels. Do you have an idea on how to log a
> message without showing it in the echo area?
Well, it's just a buffer, so you could always append to it. I'm not familiar
with the native implementation.