On May 23, 2007, at 6:15 PM, Juho Snellman wrote:
> Jonathon McKitrick <jmckitrick@...> writes:
>> I tried following the steps listed in the manual for running sb-
>> cover, but the end result is an empty report, as though I had not
>> evaluated the DECLAIM form with the sb-cover option.
> Where did you evaluate the DECLAIM form? On the REPL before doing the
Yes. Then I started including them in the first file loaded when I
though that might have been the problem.
>> 1. I assume sb-cover works on Intel Macs, but the screenshot on
>> Lemonodor could be a ppc machine. Am I wrong? I'm running sbcl
> It'll work on all architectures.
I was able to get it working after recompiling everything, uncluding
the sbcl fasls.
>> 2. I'd like to avoid recompiling all the fasl files that belong to
>> sbcl, if possible, unless this is required by sb-cover. Since I
>> don't work in my root account, I have to manually ACCEPT all the
>> only files that cannot be recompiled by the :FORCE T in the ASDF load
>> command. Is there a workaround?
> You can remove your own fasl files, and then just do a normal
> asdf:load-op without force.
I'll try that instead.