CEDET

Hi,

  You are correct.  Fortunately, this is easy to fix up for C code.
I found that the below patch got things working with arrays.

  Unfortunately, that is not the real purpose of what the separation
character, so I will resist checking this in while I contemplate a
better way to do this.

  If anyone else has a better notion for dealing with the local
context parser, I'd like to read it.

Thanks
Eric

*** semantic-c.el	22 Oct 2005 21:30:47 -0400	1.40
--- semantic-c.el	02 Dec 2005 20:35:25 -0500	
***************
*** 571,577 ****
  (defvar-mode-local c-mode imenu-create-index-function 'semantic-create-imenu-index
    "Imenu index function for C.")
  
! (defvar-mode-local c-mode semantic-type-relation-separator-character '("." "->")
    "Separator characters between something of a give type, and a field.")
  
  (defvar-mode-local c-mode semantic-command-separation-character ";"
--- 571,578 ----
  (defvar-mode-local c-mode imenu-create-index-function 'semantic-create-imenu-index
    "Imenu index function for C.")
  
! (defvar-mode-local c-mode semantic-type-relation-separator-character 
!   '("\\(\\[\\w+\\]\\)?." "\\(\\[\\w+\\]\\)?->")
    "Separator characters between something of a give type, and a field.")
  
  (defvar-mode-local c-mode semantic-command-separation-character ";"


>>> Evgeniy <dushistov@...> seems to think that:
>Hello.
>I try simple code with semantic
>struct A {
>  int a;
>  int b;
>};
>
>A var;
>var.
>M-x semantic-complete-analyze-inline RET
>and it show list of "a" and "b".
>Great.
>
>But if I write
>
>A var2[2];
>var2[0].
>M-x semantic-complete-analyze-inline RET
>It writes "Inline completetion not needed",
>
>may be I do something wrong?
>How I can get list of "a" and "b"?
>
>PS
>cedet version:		1.0pre3
>GNU Emacs 22.0.50.1
>

Hello,

another issue, 
may be it also related to "array of objects"

code:

struct A {
  int a;
  int b;
};

A a;
A *pa(&a);

pa->
M-x semantic-complete-analyze-inline
it show "a" and "b",
but if use such construction:
struct my_iterator {
	my_iterator(A *a_) : a(a_) {}
	A *operator->() { return a; }
private:
	A *a;	
};

A c;
my_iterator mi(&c);
mi->
M-x semantic-complete-analyze-inline
it show "a" and "my_iterator"

-- 
/Evgeniy