On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 02:39:41PM +0200, Martin Atzmueller wrote:
> I have made my patch for the comments in class.lisp to clarify
> the behavior of the hierarchical-type patch a bit more verbose.
> The attached patch supersedes the patch on sbcl-devel 2001-06-13.
> I think there was some not very well explained code, that seemed
> dubious, but now this should be clear.
Yes, thank you, I've merged the changes in sbcl-0.6.12.42.
> (inherits #() :type simple-vector)
> - ;; If inheritance is hierarchical, this is -1. If inheritance is not
> + ;; If inheritance is not-hierarchical, this is -1. If inheritance is
> ;; hierarchical, this is the inheritance depth, i.e. (LENGTH INHERITS).
A noteworthy example of my commenting style -- quite explicit and
absolutely wrong.:-( At least it should be better now..
William Harold Newman <william.newman@...>
pending stuff sbcl-devel:
MNA tarball of CMU CL bug test cases
PGP key fingerprint 85 CE 1C BA 79 8D 51 8C B9 25 FB EE E0 C3 E5 7C