On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 02:58:05PM +0200, Martin Atzmueller wrote:
> I think there was a lot of work done on making
> cl:*default-pathname-defaults* behave as ANSI suggests.
> Well, Bug 59 should be gone now, right, or did I miss something?
I think you're right. I simply forgot the connection to the BUGS file,
since I was making the changes in response to mailing list stuff
instead of in response to BUGS entries.
Thanks for pointing this out.
William Harold Newman <william.newman@...>
pending stuff from sbcl-devel:
MNA clarification of hierarchical type patch
MNA tarball of CMU CL bug test cases
PGP key fingerprint 85 CE 1C BA 79 8D 51 8C B9 25 FB EE E0 C3 E5 7C