Webware for Python

When's the last time you synced with CVS? Jay recently made some changes 
suggested by Geoff that should have sped up async.

-Chuck


At 02:13 PM 8/27/00 -0400, Daniel Green wrote:
>What exactly is the difference between AsyncThreadedAppServer and
>ThreadedAppServer? 'cause the asyncore version seems to be a couple dozen
>times slower on my machine (running OpenBSD 2.7). Comments by the author of
>asyncore suggest that it is most useful under Windows NT. Any confirmation
>on this?
>
>Dan Green
>
>_______________________________________________
>Webware-discuss mailing list
>Webware-discuss@...
>http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/webware-discuss

Asyncore seems to work best under Linux.  Under NT, and I guess BSD, it
is slower.  There's an issue going on that I haven't figured out yet.

Geoff's suggestions didn't help with the speed issue.  I'm surprised
it's slow under BSD, though.  I had noted that, but I figured it was
something funky with my BSD setup.

The benefit to asyncore is probably marginal on anything but a heavily
loaded site.  It will be slower for lightly loaded sites.

Jay

Daniel Green wrote:
> 
> What exactly is the difference between AsyncThreadedAppServer and
> ThreadedAppServer? 'cause the asyncore version seems to be a couple dozen
> times slower on my machine (running OpenBSD 2.7). Comments by the author of
> asyncore suggest that it is most useful under Windows NT. Any confirmation
> on this?
> 
> Dan Green
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Webware-discuss mailing list
> Webware-discuss@...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/webware-discuss

It's sounding to me like ThreadedAppServer would be a better default than 
the Async version.

-Chuck


At 05:54 PM 8/27/00 -0400, Jay Love wrote:

>Asyncore seems to work best under Linux.  Under NT, and I guess BSD, it
>is slower.  There's an issue going on that I haven't figured out yet.
>
>Geoff's suggestions didn't help with the speed issue.  I'm surprised
>it's slow under BSD, though.  I had noted that, but I figured it was
>something funky with my BSD setup.
>
>The benefit to asyncore is probably marginal on anything but a heavily
>loaded site.  It will be slower for lightly loaded sites.
>
>Jay
>
>Daniel Green wrote:
> >
> > What exactly is the difference between AsyncThreadedAppServer and
> > ThreadedAppServer? 'cause the asyncore version seems to be a couple dozen
> > times slower on my machine (running OpenBSD 2.7). Comments by the author of
> > asyncore suggest that it is most useful under Windows NT. Any confirmation
> > on this?
> >
> > Dan Green
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Webware-discuss mailing list
> > Webware-discuss@...
> > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/webware-discuss
>_______________________________________________
>Webware-discuss mailing list
>Webware-discuss@...
>http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/webware-discuss

I hear that same sound.  Hmm.

Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
> 
> It's sounding to me like ThreadedAppServer would be a better default than
> the Async version.
> 
> -Chuck
> 
> At 05:54 PM 8/27/00 -0400, Jay Love wrote:
> 
> >Asyncore seems to work best under Linux.  Under NT, and I guess BSD, it
> >is slower.  There's an issue going on that I haven't figured out yet.
> >
> >Geoff's suggestions didn't help with the speed issue.  I'm surprised
> >it's slow under BSD, though.  I had noted that, but I figured it was
> >something funky with my BSD setup.
> >
> >The benefit to asyncore is probably marginal on anything but a heavily
> >loaded site.  It will be slower for lightly loaded sites.
> >
> >Jay
> >
> >Daniel Green wrote:
> > >
> > > What exactly is the difference between AsyncThreadedAppServer and
> > > ThreadedAppServer? 'cause the asyncore version seems to be a couple dozen
> > > times slower on my machine (running OpenBSD 2.7). Comments by the author of
> > > asyncore suggest that it is most useful under Windows NT. Any confirmation
> > > on this?
> > >
> > > Dan Green
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Webware-discuss mailing list
> > > Webware-discuss@...
> > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/webware-discuss
> >_______________________________________________
> >Webware-discuss mailing list
> >Webware-discuss@...
> >http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/webware-discuss
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Webware-discuss mailing list
> Webware-discuss@...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/webware-discuss