CEDET

>>> David Ponce <david@...> seems to think that:
>Hi Eric,
>
>I saw on SF.NET that you released Semantic 1.4, but didn't see any
>announcement.  Have you posted one?

Hi,

  Yes, I posted on cedet-devel asking for some testing before posting
to gnu.emacs.sources.  I also asked for testing from ecb-devel.  In
fact I've posted several messages to which no one has responded
recently.  I'll have to go check the archives.

>Anyway, it is a great news to finally get 1.4 released :-)
>
>Just a thought: did you put a release tag on CVS?  I think this could
>be useful.  Thus, we could check our work on version 2 in, without
>loosing the possibility to fix issues on the release branch.  The
>trunk would be the current development version.

I tried creating a `snapshot', but it returned errors and I haven't
had time to figure out why.  I may have to go tag it by hand.

>More generally I think that we should tag all releases ;-)
>What do you think?

I agree.  In the past, I've been keeping the old tar files around,
but that is becoming a pain.

>Also I would like to check-in the parser API code I recently sent to
>you.  To keep the current state, before doing anything else!
  [ ... ]

That seems reasonable.  I should be able to tag what is in my area
based on those version numbers.

Eric

-- 
          Eric Ludlam:                 zappo@..., eric@...
   Home: http://www.ultranet.com/~zappo            Siege: http://www.siege-engine.com
Emacs: http://cedet.sourceforge.net               GNU: http://www.gnu.org

Eric,

>  Yes, I posted on cedet-devel asking for some testing before posting
>to gnu.emacs.sources.  I also asked for testing from ecb-devel.  In
>fact I've posted several messages to which no one has responded
>recently.  I'll have to go check the archives.
>
Curious... I didn't see your post on cedet-devel.

[...]

>I tried creating a `snapshot', but it returned errors and I haven't
>had time to figure out why.  I may have to go tag it by hand.
>
Will you tag the whole semantic branch?  Because the version of wisent
in CVS depends on the current CVS version of semantic.

[...]

>That seems reasonable.  I should be able to tag what is in my area
>based on those version numbers.
>
No problem, I have to wait for you ;-)

Thanks!
David

>>> David Ponce <david@...> seems to think that:
>Eric,
>
>>  Yes, I posted on cedet-devel asking for some testing before posting
>>to gnu.emacs.sources.  I also asked for testing from ecb-devel.  In
>>fact I've posted several messages to which no one has responded
>>recently.  I'll have to go check the archives.
>>
>Curious... I didn't see your post on cedet-devel.
>
>[...]
>
>>I tried creating a `snapshot', but it returned errors and I haven't
>>had time to figure out why.  I may have to go tag it by hand.
>>
>Will you tag the whole semantic branch?  Because the version of wisent
>in CVS depends on the current CVS version of semantic.

I think you are saying I should tag wisent since it depends on what
is in CVS right now.  Yes?

>[...]
>
>>That seems reasonable.  I should be able to tag what is in my area
>>based on those version numbers.
>>
>No problem, I have to wait for you ;-)
  [ ... ]

I don't think you need to wait.  I can tag versions in my area which
is basically what is in semantic 1.4 right now.

Eric

-- 
          Eric Ludlam:                 zappo@..., eric@...
   Home: http://www.ultranet.com/~zappo            Siege: http://www.siege-engine.com
Emacs: http://cedet.sourceforge.net               GNU: http://www.gnu.org

Hi Eric,

[...]

>>I think you are saying I should tag wisent since it depends on what
>>is in CVS right now.  Yes?
>>
Yes that's right!   Wisent in CVS depends on semantic in CVS, that is 
the current way to plug
the parser in (grammars, wisent-wy & wisent-bovine only).  The core 
wisent parser & grammar
compiler is independent of semantic :-)
The next version will use the new API in semantic (what I sent to you in 
a tarball).

>I don't think you need to wait.  I can tag versions in my area which
>is basically what is in semantic 1.4 right now.
>
Does your area include the whole semantic branch?  If so I will do the 
check-in this week-end ;-)

Thanks!
David

>>> David Ponce <david@...> seems to think that:
>Hi Eric,
>
>[...]
>
>>>I think you are saying I should tag wisent since it depends on what
>>>is in CVS right now.  Yes?
>>>
>Yes that's right!   Wisent in CVS depends on semantic in CVS, that is 
>the current way to plug
>the parser in (grammars, wisent-wy & wisent-bovine only).  The core 
>wisent parser & grammar
>compiler is independent of semantic :-)
>The next version will use the new API in semantic (what I sent to you in 
>a tarball).
>
>>I don't think you need to wait.  I can tag versions in my area which
>>is basically what is in semantic 1.4 right now.
>>
>Does your area include the whole semantic branch?  If so I will do the 
>check-in this week-end ;-)
  [ ... ]

Yes, I try to keep everything up to date so I can play with wisent
some times when I'm bored.

You mentioned earlier that you hadn't gotten my cedet/semantic 1.4
email.  I can't find it in the archives at sourceforge, perhaps I
imagined that I sent the mail.

Did you get an email about wisent I also sent?  It is in the archives
here.

http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=837711&forum_id=4869

Eric

-- 
          Eric Ludlam:                 zappo@..., eric@...
   Home: http://www.ultranet.com/~zappo            Siege: http://www.siege-engine.com
Emacs: http://cedet.sourceforge.net               GNU: http://www.gnu.org

Eric,

>Yes, I try to keep everything up to date so I can play with wisent
>some times when I'm bored.
>
Ok, so I will check my changes in soon ;-)

>You mentioned earlier that you hadn't gotten my cedet/semantic 1.4
>email.  I can't find it in the archives at sourceforge, perhaps I
>imagined that I sent the mail.
>
>Did you get an email about wisent I also sent?  It is in the archives
>here.
>
>http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=837711&forum_id=4869
>
Yes, I got it!   Sorry, I didn't reply because I was busy at work and at 
writing the new parser API and
the manual for Wisent ;-)  I will re-read it more seriously...

David