On Monday 11 February 2002 23:51, Hannu Koivisto wrote:
> [Error messages snipped...]
> However, that particular result is not the part I'm really
> interested in. As far as I can see, use of ffi:definline macro in
> my foo.lsp shouldn't be expanded at all but the compiler should
> notice it and handle it specially.
The problem is that ffi:definline had two different definitions, one in=20
ffi.lsp and another one in the compiler. The first one was bogus and has =
removed. The second one has been placed in ffi.lsp now.
>2002-02-12 =A0Hannu Koivisto =A0<azure@...>
>=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 * (load) Now respects if-does-not-exist argu=
ment in all cases.
Patch uploaded to CVS.
Thanks a lot for your work.