On Monday 20 November 2006 11:27, Fernando Correia wrote:
> I'd be glad if you could implement it. I agree the syntax is a little
> awkward. But at least it is consistent.
>
> I think the second suggestion (":=3D!") would be better.
OK; I will take care of this soon.
Best regards,
Markus
>
> 2006/11/19, Christopher Baker <slithytove2@...>:
> > I think that syntax is rather ugly. I had thought about this before. I
> > was thinking using the !, as is common in many programming languages.
> > Although one would normally use "!=3D", I think that should be flipped =
in
> > order to conform to the others currently in use (ie: :=3D< :=3D>) and u=
se
> > ":=3D!". Just my thoughts.
> > Christopher
> >
> > On 11/19/06, Markus Kr=F6tzsch <mak@...> wrote:
> > > On Friday 17 November 2006 12:05, Fernando Correia wrote:
> > > > In the inline query, is it possible to use a "not equal" condition?
> > > >
> > > > Something like <ask>[[attribute:=3D<>Something]]</ask>
> > > >
> > > > If I try
> > > >
> > > > Something like
> > > > <ask>[[attribute:=3D<Something]][[attribute:=3D>Something]]</ask>
> > > >
> > > > It won' work because "<" means "less than or equal to" and ">" means
> > > > "greather than or equal to".
> > >
> > > True, this is not avaialble at the moment. I think I can do this
> > > easily. Should it have the above syntax (:=3D<>)?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Markus
=2D-=20
Markus Kr=F6tzsch
Institute AIFB, University of Karlsruhe, D-76128 Karlsruhe
mak@... phone +49 (0)721 608 7362
http://www.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/WBS/ fax +49 (0)721 693 717
|