Yes, in fact what I would like to do is migrate to the Apache 2.x
license and have contributors sign some form of agreement to the license.
I can dig up the list of contributors and start this process. It may
take some time but eventually this would be the best form of
clarification on the licensing side.
Is anybody opposed to switching to the Apache license? I will follow-up
individually but let's have a public debate if there are strong feelings.
Thompson, Bryan B. wrote:
> It would be nice if we could clear up the confusion in the source files
> between the jdbm and the lgpl
> licences. It appears that the lgpl license files may have originated
> with the earlier db project. I have
> not survey the source files extensively to figure that out.