On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 22:57:17 +0300, Nikodemus Siivola wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, [iso-8859-1] Lars Rune Nøstdal wrote:
>> the other experiment (compiling with :invert) failed in the end after
>> trying to convert many of THESE into these .. i'll try it again later i
>> think - (and/or maybe compiling with :preserve)?
> May I ask what's the point of this excercise? What's the benefit of being
> able to build SBCL with non-upcasing readtable?
For fun, and maybe if I built it with :downcase for example, I would be
able to use :preserve and not have to use upper-case names for stuff built
during complation of SBCL itself ..
> Of course, the easist way to make SBCL buildable so would be to have SBCL
> fix the readtable for building to a known-good state -- but this is
> obviously not what you're after.
not sure I understand
> -- Nikodemus Schemer: "Buddha is small, clean, and serious."
> Lispnik: "Buddha is big, has hairy armpits, and laughs."
Lars Rune Nøstdal