Dimitry Polivaev said:
>>> Further I am going to create a special Download Package for the Flash
>> I understood the Flash and Java browsers are now part of the complete
>> package, because they're required for the corresponding export. Does it
>> make sense to create/have separate packages? People needing those will
>> anyway download the complete one.
> The reason for separating the packages is that the development of the
> flash viewer takes place separately from the development of the java
> programs. Separating the packages makes possible separating of the
> But I agree that including of the latest version of the flash browser in
> the main package makes sense too. Chris, could you include the flash
> browser in the standard package?
> Eric, can you follow my arguments?
Yes :-) I see the weakness in the fact that we don't have _one_ build
process for the Java and the Flash part. It makes package integration more
difficult than necessary. I will possibly have an issue on this with
Chris, can you please make sure that you don't too tightly bind Flash and
Java parts and/or perhaps share how/if you plan to do it?
>>> I would also like to clean the project web site up. There are a lot of
>>> stuff we do not need any more. For this I shall write a support request
>>> to the SourceForge stuff in order to get a write access to all files
>>> directories for all freemind developer. After that I shall write here
>>> what files and directories have to be deleted. Finally I shall delete
>>> all files which are no more relevant.
>> Not sure what you exactly mean here. Example?
> We definitely do not need the most part of the stuff below:
> /home/groups/f/fr/freemind$ du (filtered by me)
> 85636 .
> 1508 ./htdocs/MindMapDocs
> 4 ./htdocs/dan_test_versions
> 3704 ./htdocs/profiling
> 10072 ./htdocs/testversions_private
> 20480 ./htdocs/testversions
> 8 ./htdocs/dimitri_testversions
> 2200 ./htdocs/docs/javahelp
> 1864 ./htdocs/docs/compile
> 1224 ./htdocs/docs/Serving Freemind maps in a browser
> 4640 ./htdocs/docs/installer
> 2936 ./htdocs/docs/features
> 824 ./htdocs/docs/Using CVS via Eclipse
> 608 ./htdocs/docs/HTML User Guide
> 14320 ./htdocs/docs
> 116 ./htdocs/installer
> 84 ./htdocs/CVSROOT
> 3264 ./htdocs/javadoc
> 2216 ./htdocs-0.4
> 4 ./log
Difficult to assess the usefulness from this information, but I have the
impression that some may still be useful:
- is htdocs/docs/ completely duplicated in the Wiki?
- javadoc could be of much interest if:
- it would be up-to-date
- it would be of good quality - e.g. wouldn't it make sense to
document the plugin interface as javadoc?
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> Freemind-developer mailing list
Eric de France, d'Allemagne et de Navarre