|
Fwd: Re: DEFCONFIGURE anyone? (fwd)
From: Andrew Cooke <andrew@an...> - 2000-02-29 18:15
|
Sorry - replied directly to Ray, am now compying to list. >I think it's overkill for most apps and I also see the point about it being considered hacking (I write Internet applications for a living - these need to be able to get through firewalls and this kind of thing is "legitimate" when they are being used by a company that has approved them - I say this to point out that I am not a hacker (or rather, not a cracker)). > >You would also be faced with a chicken + egg situation - not able to download the library until you had to download a special piece of software for downloading. > >On the other hand, it does provide bi-directional data transfer. There's not many other ways of doing that from behind a firewall (you can use http, but every request going out is a new connection, which means you have to worry about state and performance takes a hit). > >Cheers, >Andrew > >PS Your proxy will provde SSL support if you can see "secure" web pages (eg account details at amazon). > >At 11:50 AM 2/29/00 -0500, you wrote: >>We have https here, but hacking these things is also a good way to get >>fired. I like my job, so I won't be doing that. >> >>Plain http is good. If the company opens up an ssh port, that would >>be good too. Hacking https to sneak stuff through is a bad idea. > http://www.andrewcooke.free-online.co.uk/index.html |
| Thread | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Fwd: Re: DEFCONFIGURE anyone? (fwd) | Andrew Cooke <andrew@an...> |