On 08/27/2013 09:56 PM, Stas Boukarev wrote:
> Stephan Frank <defclass@...> writes:
>> when I announced SB-GMP there was also interest in accessing the MPFR
>> library. I have now mostly completed work on SB-MPFR and I am currently
>> looking on input wrt. the provided interface (especially concerning the
>> shadowing of some common CL functions for their MPFR counterparts).
>> There is no fully fledged test suite yet, only a couple of sample
>> SB-MPFR requires SB-GMP in form of the the slightly updated version as
>> present in the same repository.
> Have you seen this bug-report:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbcl/+bug/1206191 ?
as you may have already seen, I have committed a fix to the development
repo of SB-GMP. If you can confirm that this resolves the problem I'd
appreciate if someone could add the updated gmp.lisp and tests.lisp to
the SBCL tree.