Any complaints if I use a LIBMESH_THREAD_LOCAL() macro rather than a
templated typedef? That way we can add a C++11 thread_local backend
On Wed, 1 May 2013, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
> Didn't realize we were, but no objections.
> On May 1, 2013, at 6:17 PM, "Roy Stogner" <roystgnr@...> wrote:
>> I see we're already using tbb::enumerable_thread_specific<> in a few
>> places; presumably we'd just wrap that but put in some --disable-tbb
>> options to get the ifdef LIBMESH_HAVE_TBB_API cases out of user code.