On 12/06/2012 11:38 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Dec 2012, David Knezevic wrote:
>> The errors I got are below. It works fine for me without complex
> My fault. Vikram's version of the patch had a little obvious breakage
> in the complex case; I thought I could fix that by hand without
> running it through the compiler in that configuration to double-check,
> but I should have known better.
> Try r6510? And I'll start running that fix through --enable-complex
> myself and make sure nothing else crops up for me either.
Yep, works fine now, thanks!