On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Roy Stogner <roystgnr@...:
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Vikram Garg wrote:
> All, I have tested out the functionality on a new example and things
>> seem to be working as desired. This patch is ready to go into trunk.
>> provide any comments/concerns, especially on the memory_solution_history.C
> Since this doesn't really touch existing functionality very closely,
> but just adds new methods and a couple default-to-noop function calls,
> I was planning to add it to trunk ASAP; if anyone else wants to look
> over the design and make suggestions it'd be appreciated, though.
Sorry, I'm way behind. I'll try and look at it tonight, but don't let me
hold up committing.