On 11/01/2012 06:36 AM, Craig Wright wrote:
> Hi Jason,
> I use SWIG in a system that also uses Qt, but none of my SWIG files
> consume Qt headers. On the other hand we build everything with qmake.
> Have you looked at SIP? AFAIK it's used to create the pyqt bindings
> and speaks Qt pretty well (signals, slots, etc.), however my
> experience with it indicated that it was less robust than SWIG. So no
> free lunch. :)
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Jason Benjamin <hexusnexus@...> wrote:
I'm trying to write an interface for D, so SIP isn't what I'm looking
for. I'm not necessarily looking for the biggest breaks, but there must
be some use for SWIG. I know that in D it's possible to just write
extern "C" wrappers, but from what I've seen with other projects, SWIG
is much easier and more elegant than that approach.