On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Chris Frey <cdfrey@...> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 04:38:51PM +0200, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
>> The article describes nothing that is not also doable with KVM these days.
>> Anyway, UML is fun and nice to use. :-)
> Doesn't KVM require the extra VM CPU features? For older CPU's, I thought
> UML was more efficient.
Sure, to run KVM you need a modern CPU (kind of).
Even my netbook supports KVM...
But you can use UML on system where you are not root and the admin has not
enabled KVM for users.