On 22 May 2012 22:43, Nikodemus Siivola <nikodemus@...> wrote:
> I already committed the SIGNAL improvements, but would much appreciate
> it if someone could find the time to review this one before I commit
> it. I keep having the feeling I'm missing something obvious.
> Non-loadable patch attached, apply on top of
> 9bc5da72887b15eb83500e16f05c3e42835476a3 or later.
> With that setup, the example above should run without consing.
The component parts having now been merged, the example /is/ now non-consing.