Hm, then I'm wondering what'd be the criteria for "published" object? Set of permissions?
AFAIK: workflow state/transition name and set of permissions are the only criteria how we define whether object is published or
not.
On Apr 10, 2012, at 8:53 PM, thomas desvenain wrote:
> I think so... but i think it should also work with documents without 'published' state... and even without any workflow.
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Vitaliy Podoba <vitaliypodoba@...> wrote:
>
> On Apr 10, 2012, at 11:02 AM, thomas desvenain wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Anthony Gerrard <anthonygerrard@...> wrote:
>> I don't agree with this bit
>>
>> "Publication date will be taken from last 'publish' workflow
>> transition date, instead of using Effective Date field"
>>
>> I have real experience of users wanting to manually override the
>> publication date displayed on news articles
>>
>> +1 I have such experience too
>>
>> and don't forget this have to work with workflows where publication can be done with an other transition than 'publish'
>
> Do you mean it's better to rely on target transition state = 'published' rather than transition name?
>
>>
>>
>> On 7 April 2012 21:28, Ross Patterson <me@...> wrote:
>> > Laurence Rowe <l@...> writes:
>> >
>> >> On 19 March 2012 12:33, Vitaliy Podoba
>> >> <vitaliypodoba@...> wrote:
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>> Actually this small improvement is a bit more than just one line template update
>> >>> (at least as it looks to me), that's why I moved that bug to a PLIP. Please,
>> >>> check it out and let me know what do you think:
>> >>> https://dev.plone.org/ticket/8699
>> >>
>> >> I prefer the simple template update approach (which doesn't really
>> >> require a plip as others have mentioned.) This seems over-complex to
>> >> me now.
>> >
>> > Ditto, please don't PLIP this, just do it.
>> >
>> > Ross
>> >
>> >
>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
>> > Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
>> > Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
>> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Plone-developers mailing list
>> > Plone-developers@...
>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
>> monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second
>> resolution app monitoring today. Free.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> Plone-developers mailing list
>> Plone-developers@...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thomas Desvenain
>>
>> Téléphone : 09 51 37 35 18
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
>> monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second
>> resolution app monitoring today. Free.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev_______________________________________________
>> Plone-developers mailing list
>> Plone-developers@...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
> monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second
> resolution app monitoring today. Free.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Plone-developers mailing list
> Plone-developers@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers
>
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas Desvenain
>
> Téléphone : 09 51 37 35 18
|